How would an optional, official parser be toxic?

[van_arn]

My guess is there will be "must have in-game parse of XXX or high. Show screenshot of proof or kick" which...sure, comes down to gameplay preferences, but people are technically already doing that with their not-technically-allowed parsing methods. To reiterate a previous post, were we to get one in game, I would hope that it would be something akin to the Duty Recorder where all members have to opt in, so there's a clear concent among people who want to be parsed (like those who want to improve/handle difficult raid tiers) and those who are fine as long as things get done without issues (like your duty roulettes and other casual dungeons).

Frankly, this is preferable to the autoattacking dragoon that expects df to carry them through the game first try otherwise everyone's an elitist.

Or the blm that can't 50% menagerie SSS expecting a carry through pf savage.

I have witnessed both.

[Floortank]

Frankly, this is preferable to the autoattacking dragoon that expects df to carry them through the game first try otherwise everyone's an elitist.

Or the blm that can't 50% menagerie SSS expecting a carry through pf savage.

I have witnessed both.

You were able to observe both without a parser. Way to torpedo your own argument.

[JohnSpawnVFX]

You were able to observe both without a parser. Way to torpedo your own argument.

Am I the only one who thinks half the time you don't even understand what you're replying to?