DPS Stance vs Tank Stance Including Healer DPS

[Reynhart]

Someone will do more damage, even if it is as minor as "DPS stance with an astro cuz they do poor dps and buff the party, but tank stance with a sch who does more personal damage and doesn't buff the tank" which will still setup a meta composition and way to play.

If the healers are balanced enough, what healer you have in your party will not change depending on your stance, cause the healing requirement will be the same.

As long as tank stance affects damage in any way, it will get number crunched and analyzed until the optimal way to play is teased out.

And if the numbers even out when pairing tank+healers DPS, people won't stop complaining when tank use their stance.

And that would have some unintended consequences both on "herp derp stance or die" and making life harder for lower tiered players.

Why does everybody thinks that it's either "You can avoid the tank stance 100% of the time and be healed easily" or "Tank stance or OS" ? There's a middle ground.

Then you have an area to engage with that doesn't make tanking absurdly difficult (by hitting so hard) for lower skilled players further alienating the rarest jobs in roulettes.

Just a reminder. Tank stance vs DPS stance doesn't matter in roulettes. Make tanking absurdly difficult in absurdly difficult content is...logical.