Her post was about a post that pointed out how those that dislike the prices are only doing so because they dont earn enough money. Answering sarcastic to such a post is imo not the worst one can do. I think that would show quite well how the other poster was kinda wrong.
Also this thread is not about retainers, P2W and other stuff. These points were discussed in other threads more than enough. This one is about pricing! And her reaction was about the post that selling the glamour (which is as important to some as savage to others) is fine because people dont have time to play the game much. So she answers that since she does not have time to raid it should be fine to put the savage stuff in the shop too. So its not about P2W, its a sarcastic hint that the argument of "I dont have time" can be used for much more.
In the end people play this game for different reasons. I for example like to collect stuff, like Glamour, Pets, Mounts. I cant complete my collectin and thus cant reach my goal thanks to the cash shop. So for me all those mounts and stuff in there is like putting savage gear in it. But somehow we should be fine with that because its only glamour. (But again this topic is more about the prices..)
And your post about saying that people just dont want those prices because they dont earn enough money wont help me understand your perspective very little. We have given more reasons than that but you put them down to: We dont earn enough and thats why we dislike it. Thats also not how to do a discussion. I did use a bigger price because I wanted to point out how one could even use the argument there. Lets get a bit down. If they go around and add a mount for 50$. Would you be fine with that? Would you go around and say that people just dont earn enough money and thus should not complain about the price. When will they reach your comfortable zone? And yet when they reach that another person can just come and say: Welp they can do whatever they want this is just glamour and since I can buy this without a problem you should not complain because you just need to earn more.
This was my point of the post. To show that even if they would raise the price soo high, that you could still use your argument. So it does not make a good argument for me. (And enough people already pointed out that they could buy it but that they still find it too high)
Oh I know. I would also completely argue against SE if they ever decide to put them in the shop (even if this would never hurt me). I am just sad that its fine for some people because its just glamour. Yet glamour/pets/mounts may mean a lot for some of us (just like some love savage). If I might want to nitpick I could argue that they can put the weapons in there as pure glamour too without any stats thus making them useless in fights. I am still sure that this would not be fine for a lot of people that raid even though its just glamour too. In the end I wanted to point out how you can spin that argument to everything.