What's your first impression of Eureka?

[Fyce]

Yes, you can stretch this argument, but as I already tried to imply: It doesnt hold true for dungeons, trials and raids.
Compare Byakko and Shinryu - both are pretty different fights and thats thanks to their mechanics.
[...]

Different NMs have different mechanics and attack patterns. Ignoring that while stating the same thing for Byakko and Shinryu/-whatever other comparison you made- is a double standard, in my eyes. At least, it's a subjective view on it, as you and you only decided to draw the line where you drew it.
You make a difference between Susano and Ramuh? You make a difference between The Temple of the Fist and Snowcloak? But you don't make a difference between Serket and Bombadeel? Why is that? (I know why, but my point is that it's a subjective reason.)

I can accept that Eureka gets "better" - but just in the sense how the white chocolate I dont like gets better when you add almonds to it. What I mean by that is: the content being (slightly) better at a higher level doesnt make it good if the core-element is still not enjoyable.
Someone pointed out earlier that the combat system of this game isnt designed to entertain you for 30 minutes if you're only doing your base-rotation and nothing else. And I believe they're right - but Eureka requires excatly that, wether you're level 1 or 20.
If you dont enjoy mob-chaining-FATE-training at level 1 (or 5 or 10), you probably wont at level 20 either.

Well, I never said it was good. I said the experience was different.
Lv.1 can't do jack. Lv.20 can do evertyhing. That's... it.