What's your first impression of Eureka?

[Fyce]

Well on this I can actually agree with you. Because it's impossible to have an argument when one side can't muster a real argument but rather resorts to dishonesty. You've been quote mining, cherry picking, straw manning, and broadly generalizing others arguments all throughout this thread. If you won't be honest then I'm done trying to respond to you.

I gave the arguments on my opinion regarding Eureka in my very first post. You answered me with a lot of what appeared to be contradictory statements. I pointed out the flaws in what you said. However, You didn't bother defending your opinions and clearing them up for the sake of disambiguation, and to actually making your points hold ground. I did. I did defend my views using multiple examples as well as making comparisons with older content that people have done. And I didn't assume random stuff I had no information on (such as how much people think that Eureka is okay, and how much find it "99% garbage"). I don't need other people to defend my views either.

I may be in the minority of people in this thread who are actually capable of seeing both the good and bad aspects of Eureka, instead of spitting on everything, but as far as argumentation goes, I've yet to see people coming to invalid my statements with something that I would have nothing to answer to. Except for Krotoan, who agreed with me on the fact that there are many subjective aspects to this debate, and that s/he actually liked running old content, which is something I don't share.

So yeah, glad we've put an end on this endless nonsense.
Keep the hate and negativity, you're doing great.

Would you rather a world where we can't say anything negative about it if a company doesn't explain why content gets constantly delayed and then comes out poorly?

I just want people to stop making baseless assumptions.

As for the rest of your post, I already said that I didn't care about the time it took them to release it. I know what kind of stuff might happen during development. And since I don't know what content might have been cut because of Eureka, if any (which has yet to be proven), I won't comment on it. Simply because I can't. But it seems that people will still make strong opinions about things they don't know jack about. I don't think that's right.
Lastly, we grind stuff on ARR since 2.0. Saying that this game isn't meant for grinding when it's rooted in its core content is nonsense. Especially since the game is doing extremely well while keeping this formula.