Results -9 to 0 of 347

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    Vstarstruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    1,128
    Character
    Beastmistress Milk
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Black Mage Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Squintina View Post
    I also think the response is just fine. They can't after 3 days mention more specific things as they need to review all the feedback, see what fits the direction they're going with, do man-hour estimates, etc... The most a community team member (or even a dev) would be able to say about anything that would be more significantthan just changing loot tables is "We are reviewing other feedback for further updates in the future" - and that's hardly necessary. Surely it's obvious that if they read enough feedback to know people don't like the loot box sparklers/untradable rewards, then they've also seen all the other feedback and are thinking of ways to make the community happy.
    With their track record with anything in this game, no it is not obvious. We are not listened to.
    Diadem 1.0
    Diadem 2.0
    Diadem 3.0
    The same methods, the same mistakes.
    https://riversofeden1.files.wordpres..._quote_960.jpg

    I guess you missed the post that spoke on the lack of interaction with the PvP issues and the PvP forum for one of the comments to putting everything in one thread. Because that is proof that method to these forum also does not work in being heard.
    Quote Originally Posted by Isala View Post
    It's easy to say "Consolidate your feedback.", but we've been doing that for years in the PvP forum, and get an SE post once every 6 months if we're lucky.
    I am not asking for Rome in a day, I am not asking to give us more changes, I am asking for MORE COMMUNICATION and INTERACTION, like them actually talking to us, not a copy/paste post that is posted somewhere in each language. I am also confused why that post was not posted in that one positive feedback thread where they spoke about lockboxes more (I even commented on lock box issues) So when you see a post out of context like that, it really makes me question how much they listen and and communicate with us.

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe777 View Post
    You have to take into account the ratio of people that enjoy Eureka and people that don't enjoy Eureka, as well as how that ratio holds up to all the other content in the game when it was new/fresh. Do you honestly expect SE to just remove Eureka because some people don't enjoy it and put something else in its place? Even if they did that it would not happen right away, in fact probably not even for months.

    That said, it is nice what reply we actually got. It's honestly something at least I didn't expect.
    It is not a nice reply though, why do you accept that? just because it is rare to get a reply? it shouldn't be like that. You also need to remember we lost a lot of content for 4.0 + to get this released, so the fact we got so little.. for that..?
    (10)
    Last edited by Vstarstruck; 03-17-2018 at 05:00 AM.