Dev blog: New Feast rewards

[Aviars]

She claimed Ultimate may lose the ilvl sync based on the precedent set. They have never kept content permanently synced. Therefore, it's entirely reasonably to assume come 5.0 they will continue that trend. She never said she wanted it nerfed. That was you putting words in her mouth just as you have done with virtually everyone who responded.

Taking away the exclusivity doesn't make it easier. It makes it consistent. Why should Feast have timed exclusive mounts when Savage and Ultimate don't?

It could go either one or two ways. Instead of suggesting Ultimate should stay exclusive she suggests Feast rewards should be easier to obtain. Maybe you should read between the lines?

With your suggestions making it available to top 1000 is making it easier. Also, why should Ultimate and Savage have exclusive weapons and top 100 not have exclusive weapons? As you can see your argument can easily be turned against you. why is anything in this game unique???? Why is SE doing something different???? I hate things that are different!!! Basically you in a nutshell

I said no such thing, and you're more than welcome to quote me directly if you believe otherwise. You insisted PvP and PvE should be viewed separately. I pointed out the hypocrisy of that stance since the exclusive mounts came from PvE content, thus you can't claim PvP is wholly separate when its rewards are inspired from PvE.

In fact, I have no qualms with either mounts requiring active Feast or season participation. My only complaint is their exclusivity.

PVP and PVE are two different game modes. Their progression is no where near connected. they are completely separate entities that do not require one another to exists. Just because of some vague thematic connection of the rewards doesn't mean everything PVP has magically becomes something PVE is entitled to as you would suggest.

You complain about exclusivity and in the same breath say you have no problem with SEASONAL TIMED participation. I guess the real problem you have is the fact that the best 100 players in the data center get the rewards? I guess we now know why you keep trying to increase the number to 1000.

Curious that your post has a convenient edit attached to it while mine doesn't yet I quoted you directly. Are you that much of a child you need to flat out lie over a simple typo? Wow, indeed.

You can look at the time of my edit and the time of your post. There is a 16 minute difference. There was nothing fishy going on like you would imply. Just accept you were wrong?

Nor will you convince me Feast should have a timed exclusive mount only 660 people can obtain when every other piece of content has no such limitation. You simply want to lord your mounts over people.

Alas, we have reached an impasse.

Earlier you said you weren't against seasonal participation, so in effect that is just wrong. You literally contradicted yourself. Sorry

In the end your only real qualm is the fact that only top 100 people per datacenter would receive such rewards. There is a reason you keep trying to increase the threshold to 1000. If you really only cared about the timed aspect then you would've made it so top 100 players of future seasons would have a chance at older top 100 rewards, but instead you keep trying to increase it.

Maybe you need to be consistent with your argument like you want SE to remain unchanging in how they operate their game. LOL