Developers, Please Address Samurai Kicking

[Awha]

When you join a PF you agree to the terms set by the leader. Sure it would be nice if they advertised their PF requirements so you do not waste their time or yours, but as far I know that is not required.

Do not take it personal, if they removed you from the group for such a reason it clearly was not a group you would want to be a part of. Your best bet is either make your own group, or join a group of like minded individuals and just show you are a quality player building up a positive reputation.

[Mahrze]

When you join a PF you agree to the terms set by the leader. Sure it would be nice if they advertised their PF requirements so you do not waste their time or yours.

What do you do tho, when the PF is open on DPS and because you're a "non-meta" class and you get kicked because of that, even when the PF did not define DPS jobs in particular?

if PF leader makes an open DPS slot and then kicks cuz he gets a sam or a blm, the one who joins isn't at fault.

[Awha]

What do you do tho, when the PF is open on DPS and because you're a "non-meta" class and you get kicked because of that, even when the PF did not define DPS jobs in particular?

if PF leader makes an open DPS slot and then kicks cuz he gets a sam or a blm, the one who joins isn't at fault.

As I said it would be nice if they listed their requirements so players do not waste their personal time or the time of the PF group, but to my knowledge by no means are they required to do so

[Mahrze]

As I said it would be nice if they listed their requirements so players do not waste their personal time or the time of the PF group, but by no means are they required to do so.

They technically are, but we're gonna disagree till the end of time, so we can leave it at that.

[Awha]

They technically are, but we're gonna disagree till the end of time, so we can leave it at that.

I did not know that it was required to list out all requirements for the PF. Thank you for that info.

[Vidu]

What do you do tho, when the PF is open on DPS and because you're a "non-meta" class and you get kicked because of that, even when the PF did not define DPS jobs in particular?

if PF leader makes an open DPS slot and then kicks cuz he gets a sam or a blm, the one who joins isn't at fault.

It might not be the BLM/SAMs fault, but that still doesnt mean that they're entitled to that slot. Its still the party of the partyleader and they decided what/who they want in their party. Opening a PF with open DPS slots doesnt mean they have to stick with whatever now - its not nice and its annoying and they should have set up the PF better if they wanted to exclude certain jobs, but by no means do they have to keep anyone in their party, they dont want their. Its still their party, their rules.

[Mahrze]

It might not be the BLM/SAMs fault, but that still doesnt mean that they're entitled to that slot. Its still the party of the partyleader and they decided what/who they want in their party. Opening a PF with open DPS slots doesnt mean they have to stick with whatever now - its not nice and its annoying and they should have set up the PF better if they wanted to exclude certain jobs, but by no means do they have to keep anyone in their party, they dont want their. Its still their party, their rules.

"it is what it is, but it isn't" got it.

[NephthysVasudan]

"it is what it is, but it isn't" got it.

I love these hypocritical contradictions that people come up with....don't you?

[Mahrze]

I love these hypocritical contradictions that people come up with....don't you?

I don't see it as hypocritical. I understand the reasoning, I just chose to let it be.