Quote Originally Posted by Fynlar View Post
Well, it's not going to happen. They already said as much.

Here's what I want to know: do you actually stand by "original intentions" or not?

If yes, why are you defending their new policy of no more than 1 personal house per server and saying people who had more should get evictions when that wasn't the way it was before?
If no, why are you making a point out of housing only being "originally intended" for FCs, when clearly that isn't the case anymore and hasn't been for a while?
Because it's a little more complicated than the black and white answer you seek, and you care not for the nuance, so I'm not going to waste my time talking to someone that doesn't want to listen.

Quote Originally Posted by Sothis View Post
You're out for blood from 100% legit players too
Yeah, because players that have more than one personal house per server per account are 100% legit...

Don't try to take the moral high ground when you're standing in the morass of illgotten gains.

Quote Originally Posted by Jellybums View Post
When you only think of multi-plot owners as thieves, the dialogue dies there.
By the current restrictions, SE redefined them to be thieves - for they have resources they should not have, and resources another could use.

If that's not the definition of thievery, I don't know what is.

Quote Originally Posted by Jellybums View Post
But you have to admit if not for personal buyers, wards would mostly be empty and who knows if we'd even have a housing system at all if the wards were scrapped as failures.
Or if SE would have had the stones to enforce their restrictions upon the player-base and not grandfather anyone in, we wouldn't have this discussion. SE doesn't allow any newer player to have more than one personal house per account per server, so why should they grandfather in the older owners?

SE needs to have the stones to force the older owners to release their excess houses. If a newer player can't get it, they shouldn't have it either.