Quote Originally Posted by Reynhart View Post
That's just an oversight on SE, like in a lot of other systems. They set a specific set of objective rules for using the kick system and expect their playerbase to respect them.
And when people used it in subjective situations, they realized that they wouldn't have the manpower to deal with it, and create the general response of "SOrry, can't do anything, different playstyle", that can technically covers any kick situation that didn't end in insult-fest.


The simple fact you don't actually need real majority is another oversight.
I feel like there is no way for you to know these things and so to state them as facts instead of your own theories is sort of intellectually dishonest. You may be right though, the issue still remains though that you can't doubt the validity of these kinds of kicks because in the eyes of the people responsible for saying "is this okay?" the answer has been a resounding "yes" so the support for this comes not only from players but from SE themselves.

If your job decided tomorrow that it was okay to fire people for wearing a red shirt and you wore a red shirt and were fired for it.... Well, you knew the rule, didn't you? Sure, maybe there isn't any harm in wearing a red shirt but in the end the company made a judgment call.

In terms of the majority thing I see it as a majority - the perpetrator of a crime doesn't get a vote on the jury after all.