Is this a real 9-page argument?
Or is this like...roleplay?![]()
Its not even an argument.
The entire basis of the OP's "argument" is that SE saying Balmung is overpopulated is not a good reason to lock it because there's no evidence to prove that what SE is saying is true. When we ask him "as opposed to...?", he just keeps repeating that we're the ones with fallacious arguments and we should be the ones to provide evidence. As if SE has some kind conspiracy strictly targeted at Balmung and its trying to lie its way out of not locking it.
I want to say this has been the best kind of tinfoil babble about secret corporate hush-hush fooling the masses into believing anything they want but I've seen flat earth people do a better job than this.
Healing DRK is literally... the same since ShB. The reason why people think it's a meme to heal nowadays because DRK receives very little to no buff to their sustainability vs 3 other tanks getting something useful. If you're capable of healing DRK back in ShB (or any tanks), then you'll heal EW DRK just fine.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.