Kick Abuse

[RitsukoSonoda]

The real problem is "difference in playstyle" carries too broad of a scope. If difference in playstyle is accepted as legitimate grounds for a vote kick then it would be fine to kick players for the following
-The job they are using because it doesn't fit in your desired "meta"
-Opening a treasure chest because you didn't want the item inside
-Not participating in their ERP during the duty

The list of absurd reasons is limitless under this one term. I feel it should only count when it crosses the line into harassment.

[Kogekigami]

The real problem is "difference in playstyle" carries too broad of a scope. If difference in playstyle is accepted as legitimate grounds for a vote kick then it would be fine to kick players for the following
-The job they are using because it doesn't fit in your desired "meta"
-Opening a treasure chest because you didn't want the item inside
-Not participating in their ERP during the duty

The list of absurd reasons is limitless under this one term. I feel it should only count when it crosses the line into harassment.

Pretty much. It would be nice if they can come foreward and say fine this is the written down in stone rule and where it ends. Cause yes in theory with a loose term of 'difference of playstyle' A bard could kick a samurai cause its not a drg so they won't get the piercing resistance.