How do you feel about them talking about divided servers?

[Fensfield]

And as I said the 2.0 servers arent at SE yet so they will look in on the 2.0 test server they will have and open it to people in the regional offices to check the latency around the world, and if it is unacceptable they will have no choice to move them out of Japan if they use regional servers.

They should beable to get the latency down to atleast 0.2sec with the 2.0 servers and any changes they do with the networking equipment without any problem with the servers in Japan, if they are using up to date equipment it should go down more.

I'm sorry, what you said was:

The servers will not be segrigared by language to allow people to communicate better, they will segrigate by region, so they can have the US servers in America, the EU servers in London (probably) and the Japanese servers in Tokyo

'Will' as opposed to 'May', with, at the time, no mention of their focusing first on mitigating lag without having to deal with the huge expense involved in moving the servers and subsequently maintaining them overseas.

That's what I was replying to. I'm sorry, my last post was not a direct argument with your standpoint on the issue at hand, wholly against segregation though I may be; it was simply a response to your seemingly stating the possibility (thus far seemingly implied as a final option and quite unlikely due to all the improvements could be made without moving) of the servers moving as if it were a fact.

Call it a nitpick if you want, but enough people in this thread are making that mistake as to make me feel it's important to correct that and offer a source.

So.. yeah, 'glad you seem to understand and all. Sorry.