Tank Balance Achieved?

[MauvaisOeil]

About IR and unchained : Why is unchained an ability designed to allow us to deal more damages in tank, thus keeping us in defiance with increased damage benefits, and IR is not an ability allowing us to increase resistance in deliverance ?

The fact they both have the same effect, except one is tied to more dps in an already DPS role is absurd. And it would soften the whole "My dps revolves around a 2min timer" if the warrior had his DPS balanced withouth accounting for IR spamtime.

[Xenosan]

..

IR is mostly compensation for taking away Wrath gain from Berserk, RI, and Vengeance. But right, even with that in mind why is it locked to Deliverance.

Add +20% Healing Received to Thrill of Battle, and put that on a shared/locked cooldown with Unchained if they wanted something of a 'Defiance in Deliverance' and a 'Deliverance in Defiance' paradigm.

But I'm not a fan of those concepts anymore. FellCleave/InnerBeast & SteelCyclone/Decimate is enough of a duality paradigm IMO. Why are they adding more when IB/FC & Dec/SC are still not where they need to be,

[Freyyy]

IR is mostly compensation for taking away Wrath gain from Berserk, RI, and Vengeance.

No, the compensation for taking away wrath stacks from Berserk, RI and Vengeance is the new Storm's Path. IR is just another DPS cooldown.

[Umbeliel]

Add +20% Healing Received to Thrill of Battle, and put that on a shared/locked cooldown with Unchained if they wanted something of a 'Defiance in Deliverance' and a 'Deliverance in Defiance' paradigm.

I'm not going to get in the duality thing(since I'm mostly on the side of "warrior offence and defense should be directly tied together somehow ") but I just wanted to agree with you here and say that thrill should have a 20% increased heal on it anyway. It's just an extra, small heal on a big cooldown and is only really useful for upheaval as is.