Quote Originally Posted by Reynhart View Post
"I'll quote you without even typing what I quote and make a purposedly vague sentence so that I don't have to develop my answer".
Yeah, sure...

I'll leave you to your unexplained "equity"...
I guess my sarcasm went over your head. Apologies, ill explain for you. I found it funny that despite for the third time laying out the argument in detail you not only failed to engage it, but instead nitpicked musings about what "games" have or don't have a meta.(You are wrong about those by the way. White does have an accepted first turn advantage in chess theory and your responses to SF and LoL are that they have a more balanced meta, therefore they are examples of games without metas that favor some picks over others. That is a stupid argument.) Its not rocket science, other posters have engaged the idea and we had a parlay about their response. I know you read those posts because you keep copying my responses to them and attempting to weigh in, although even there you seem to lack an understanding of context.

I'm not explaining what I mean by "equity" any further, go reread, google things you don't understand. Again, others haven't had an issue understanding. Its not a failure of the message its a failure of the receiver at play here.