Quote Originally Posted by Bourne_Endeavor View Post
This is a bad argument because it works in reverse. You want things to remain exclusive because you prefer it that way. Therefore, calling someone childish for expressing their preference is hypocritical regardless of your disagreement. Let's be honest, whether we ask for changes or encourage things remain the same, we're doing so because it expressly appeals to our own individual interests. And that's fine. I want to stress that. But own it.
Well, the problem with your reverse is that we're not only asking for something we want in terms of items etc. but also for the devs to uphold their promise.

And, this might be me, but: If someone is so much of a collector that they get seriously upset about someone having some mounts they cant have, I'm worried...

I remember our discussion about veteran rewards and it was a good one, thank you for that btw! I hope you dont mind if I share your "conclusion" (or at least what I believe it could be) from that: You guys need to relax. You're looking at those mounts with envy and you ruin a game for yourself by thinking "Person A has something I cant have, thats sooo unfair!" There are things in life you cant achieve because they are not meant for you. Those mounts are even having "legacy" in their name, right? They are not meant for you. You have plenty to choose from and plenty to obtain. There are achievments and titles from 1.0 we cant achieve anymore - because 1.0 was different from ARR/HW. Why is it so hard to let those loyal people keep their special stuff to remember 1.0? And not take away the value that it also gets from being something from a different era?