Depends on the person; if they're spamming Alexander to get it done, they have no reason to touch poetic, especially when poetic itself is in a vacuum (your only source of this is 50 roulettes and 50 dungeons) compared to law tomes.
I never liked the hunts, but I specifically do not like the idea of hunts being the more optimal way of getting progression in current content (which has been reoccurring since...well hunting's implementation). It doesn't make any sense for 2.x to be rewarding both allied and centarou seals, while 3.x hunts only rewards centarou seals, on top of the anima items being allied seals only. Hunts always come bck to life because they keep making it relevant (and usually the best/fastest) for getting current gear.
Despite that, you could always get by with 2-4 manning the 2.x A ranks anyway if you went out to look for them. Putting more incentive in the rear end of the content cycle is giving me the vibe that they're running out of ideas for the forefront (which supposedly they have everything mapped out). That's how it was on Famfrit anyway. Now we just have more people killing the hunts without ever calling it out, and the times that it does get called out is usually the off chance.
It hurts the perspective of players who are expecting play 3.x content in a 3.x patch cycle. If redoing content like this is passable (versus things like daily clan hunt bills, large temple guildleves, or even red scrips and eso), then would it be passable if future steps required us to tackle 2.x treasure maps or 2.x guildleves? It significantly downplays my hopes for the game if they can get by with reusing old content to this severity.
At least the CT weekly hand weaves it as a "journey through your mind" and "reliving the experiences". Step 2 only does that with The vault, while everything else, apparently the tonberries are still being harassed (by the amaa'jja no less), Madpoor keep is still under void influence, and you're still fighting Midgardsomr,when he's already traveling with you at this point.




Reply With Quote

