(Un)Official Summoner Feedback Thread [3.0 Edition]

[Saggo]

My point is we know nothing on exactly how this glamour system will be tackled and therefore no one can really form a well grounded opinion on that front.

We can still make some pretty simple educated inferences. From their responses we have every right to assume it's no different than armor glamour, since they actively opposed something like Summon IV+ and made no mention of models modifying potency or behavior. It's logical to comment on their official statements. If they do a system like that, it won't be because of anything they've told us as of this time.

But if this thread is going to be truly constructive, then more depth needs to be added to peoples posts. Like in the first initial posts to this thread or in my previous comment how I mentioned how you brought up a good point about Garuda's/Titans's ability potency being increased, despite them just being glamours of E.Carby/T.Carby and what that could mean for the new Egi glamours. I don't get why you didn't focus on that to help get a good and actual constructive discussion going instead of keeping it to the same cycle of comments.

Forgive me if you weren't initially responding to me, but I'm aware of what Carby->Garuda does, considering I brought the point up in that very context. I wouldn't call them "just" glamours, their two functions of changing models and increasing potency are distinct from each other, especially since SE gave a pretty clear precedence with armor glamour. They're essentially pokemon evolutions, and yeah, that would be a neat system not a lot of MMOs have.

But I was being plenty constructive enough. New Summons aren't invalidated by peoples' need to use the best; a simple, and constructive, point. You latched onto what was clearly a side remark and are trying to force a conversation out of it when I was obviously talking about something else. I don't need a lecture because I didn't acquiesce.