Results -9 to 0 of 171

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Player
    Zedd702's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    in yer Kool-Aid
    Posts
    412
    Character
    Razai Sylvain
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 58
    Quote Originally Posted by kiotsukete View Post
    So the other poster and I were complaining about other buyers in general (not you to us specifically), but who do the same thing you do - buying the next lowest listing in a useless attempt to teach some stupid "lesson" against small undercutting. We are arguing the principle, that buying another seller's listing just because the undercut wasn't big enough in the buyer's opinion (whether 1, 5, or 100 gil w/e) is frustrating to the seller and ignorant of the buyer. It's called reading comprehension. You should learn it before whining about others' lack of it.
    Firstly, I have no issue with reading comprehension. I was making a general statement, but I was stating you had more of a mathematics issue, because I was SPECIFICALLY pointing out 1 gil undercutting, not next lowest price. BIG difference with the two. Perhaps you should, read, re-read or re-re-read my post and work that tid bit out before calling anything ignorant when you did not understand my post in the first place... THAT's reading comprehension. OH and by the way, save the snappy flame for a nice set of firewood, not me...

    And for the record the second person made a joke about referring directly to me about buyin x item because it was 100 gil difference, but yeh you get reading comprehension... right....


    Quote Originally Posted by kiotsukete View Post
    So what use is it to not to buy the lowest listing, then? There are few sellers who are innocent of such undercutting...
    If it is a reasonable undercut as I tried to point out previously, then I will consider it. 1 gil undercutting is not a bargain so I pick what I want to pick. If you think it is a bargain, then you are delusional... Simple as that.
    (0)
    Last edited by Zedd702; 01-07-2015 at 10:33 AM. Reason: clarification