SE's most difinitive statement yet on parsers

[raelgun]

The whole point of this debate is that, yes, this is already occurring in XIV, when policy states that it shouldn't be able to. Why do you think they've switched their vocal line from Yoshi's original statements?

Again you brought up steam, a platform not really known for its mmo launches, it has some, but not really known for it and talking about its DRM policies, which you have been ranting about.

Actually they havent really switched, have you read the article that was linked above, parsers will make their way through addons, they just dont want develop an official one, and the reasons were the same as blizzards stance would you believe, but they wont stop player made ones.

Are you trying to say bottom line, that players by no means regardless arent allowed to do that, so they need to be stuck with them? Why cant players have the right to do that, this is a question for you. People should have the right to group with who ever they like.

People only ever talk about the person under performing and their feelings, but no one ever considers the player who is doing good and their feelings on the matter, some of these players prefer to play with others on par with themselves and not boost others, why cant they have this right.

[Amberyl]

Are you trying to say bottom line, that players by no means regardless arent allowed to do that, so they need to be stuck with them? Why cant players have the right to do that, this is a question for you. People should have the right to group with who ever they like.

Sorry, are you really asking this? Look at the kick-vote reason options. Do you see one for 'poor performance?'

If you wish you group with who you choose, you have the ability to use the PF and pre-form.

And yes, I've read it. Policy-statements have been posting in this thread over and over, and their message is clear.

My whole statements are regarded strictly here at end game where analysis is important.

The other guy not going fast enough for you does not excuse you from the conduct terms and conditions, no. I return you to the bit about the choice of options on the kick-vote screen. Do you see one for 'poor performance?'

Now I presume you're just trolling for the sake of it. If you're honestly confused by this, go and read TOS.

[raelgun]

Sorry, are you really asking this? Look at the kick-vote reason options. Do you see one for 'poor performance?'

If you wish you group with who you choose, you have the ability to use the PF and pre-form.

And yes, I've read it. Policy-statements have been posting in this thread over and over, and their message is clear.

are you honestly caring about random grouped with random dungeons ?
Dont give a damn about 4 mans or HM trials, its end game where stuff like this matters, and this is pretty much where the debate is regarded, DPS checks exist in end game, barely for 4 mans and guess what, PF is mostly made for those end game fights, people trying to grasp at every straw they can, when stuff goes wrong, its more important to know what happened, and things go wrong more at end game. My whole statements are regarded strictly here at end game where analysis is important.