Yuo do realize that the post you made, was in response to someone mentioning thrill of battle.
In which you stated you could also include foresight or vengeance.
You then stated afterwards you weren't suggesting using 2 or 3 CD's ina macro, but in this quote above, you did.
I fail to see how it is an error in reading when it is something you are explicitly stating.
Hardly, I was using it as a part of the argument, not that it was the whole of it.
Are you not being stuck on a simple statement as well?
Not necessarily, some abilities are just too weak by themselves another CD is necessary to be used with it liek Blood bath, Featherfoot, Foresight and Convalescence..
Those are abilities which improve once they've been paired up, and situations only really change according to degree, which is something easily measured.
Of course you can avoid the problem entirely by simply not macroing.
Why are you attempting to shift the argument in such a lackluster manner?
People will complain about the way other people play if they feel it is going to impede them.
This was a direct response to when you stated that no one has the right to call you lazy.
Of course they do if your gameplay is affecting them.
You can't dismiss someone else's opinion, but then feel the need to press yours forward without worry of critique and not risk the same dismissal.
Read above.
You can objectively look at the effect of macroing your cooldowns and other abilities.
Comfort is one thing, but efficiency is another.
You typically can't have both simply because the nature of tank cooldowns lend themselves to having to be used separately due to their multiplicative nature.
So slapping Sentinel and Rampart together does afford more survivability, but not muc more than you would think it does.
Didn't ignore it, I addressed each and every point which is why I multi-quoted.
If you felt I ignored it then merely re-quote it and point out what you felt was ignored and I will address it over again.


Reply With Quote

