Results -9 to 0 of 62

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    realistic1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    95
    Character
    Kahlan Amnell
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 50
    Whether or not people bot should not be a factor in deciding whether or not the rewards are adequately dispersed.


    The problem is not whether adequate rewards are being dispersed for losing; it is the frequency of losing versus winning. You would not be posting in this thread if you won 90% of your matches.

    If the problem is the win/loss ratio, then you need to look at why this is so onesided. Two reasons for losses (there are more of course) are solo queue matches against 3 man premades and bots. People that call for higher rewards for losing are simply asking to exacerbate one of these problems and exacerbating any issue that contributes to the lopsided win/loss ratio will do nothing but intensify the existing problem.

    I would much rather focus on the true issue (lopsided win/loss ratios for those not doing premades) such as seeing the game changed so that anything greater than a 2 man premade is paired against other premades and/or pairing teams with similar average gear levels than increase the marks for losing.

    People will bot until banned. Nothing will change that.

    I completely agree with the above but there are things than can certainly escalate the amount of bots and rewarding them with an increase in marks for botting and losing is one of these things. No one is claiming that bots don’t exist or need to be banned but why the heck would we be thinking of rewarding the botting action even more?
    (0)
    Last edited by realistic1; 01-01-2014 at 09:06 PM.