Warrior "buff" in 2.1: not what we are expecting?

[ZDamned]

Also stoneskin is 5% more effective on war
Lustrate (almost useless on a pld compared to a normal heal from a relic healer) works pretty well on war

How did you come to this conclusion?

[glen7187]

How did you come to this conclusion?

Not sure about the Lustrate, but I assume the stoneskin part cause WAR has more HP and Stoneskin scales off HP.

[Ladon]

Not sure about the Lustrate, but I assume the stoneskin part cause WAR has more HP and Stoneskin scales off HP.

Lustrate is good because it's instant cast. Less about how much it heals.

Also it appears that it generates a set amount of aggro rather than based off the amount healed.

[ZDamned]

Not sure about the Lustrate, but I assume the stoneskin part cause WAR has more HP and Stoneskin scales off HP.

That mathematically works still in favor of Paladins. =P Stone Skin takes damage after the 20% Shield Oath reduction, so it's a wash pretty much, otherwise 2-4 points of damage in favor of Paladins.

UNLESS timed to be cast with Thrill of Battle up, in which case, Warrior gets a Super powered Stone Skin. 25% Hp + 20% more HP to work with, but again, thats a coordinated buff with a Buff scenario, and only useful for 3 casts per 2 minutes.