Small Rant on Seal Rolls in Hamlet parties

[Wynn]

I hate to tell you this, but life isn't fair. The loot switch is irrelevant. Lets say the loot the guy switched from dropped. Since he changed to seal now you all get to roll on the digger helm (example). You win it. He runs here and post a QQ thread like you saying he wanted the digger helm and didn't need seals and this guy that had a seal took his helm.

So instead of having to read his QQ i have to read yours.

Basically your QQ'ing because you didn't get 2 seals. Guess what, ive run 100's of hamlets. Probably over 300 total. Everyone was rolling on seals back when I did it. Suck it up and run it again.

I'm not QQing at all. Just discussing something I find to be unethical and to see what everyone else thinks as well. It is pretty much as I expected.

If you read my initial post I specifically stated I hold no ill will toward the players since I had already won a seal that evening.

[Meatdawg]

I'm not QQing at all. Just discussing something I find to be unethical and to see what everyone else thinks as well. It is pretty much as I expected.

I was in a hamlet party and before the last run, one player asked to switch his loot preference from one of the other drop items to a seal. I wasn't sure at the time why they wouldn't want seals to begin with if they still needed seals but when put to vote by the party leader, I said sure.

If he wins, whatever happens after the fact is irrelevant because you agreed to it. He can keep it, he can pass it to you, he can pass it to his friend, he can destroy it.

This whole thread is a QQ because he passed loot he won in rules that you agreed with.