Quote Originally Posted by Ixmo View Post
Adding these types of comments to the OP clearly show how immature you're being to other people's opinions. You're definitely making this a one sided argument on the front page by adding what looks like mature and compelling arguments in favour of yourself and taking very small portions (including only a third of what I last posted, not displaying all of my argument) of what appear to be very weak arguments with attached hate for the opposing.

Also, yes, Square HAD to rebuild the entire engine from scratch, because otherwise they would never get the numbers required to make this game even partially a success. They have done nothing but lose a huge amount of money with 1.0 and no amounts of changes to the current engine would ever drastically increase subscription level. I think you need to take a step back and look at things from a clear perspective, because the way you're going on about things it's like you think 1.0 was a godsend of a game and didn't need to be changed in any way.
Okay what the fuck. Now i'm the one being mad.

I added the last portion of your post because in my opinion it was summarising your view. Not to cut anything. You're being seriously unfair here.

As for AntonyB's post, shouldn't i be allowed to post it because its not exactly your approach on the subject? It is a different approach and has every right to be represented.

If you think i'm still being biased, (although i unavoidably am, since i represent a view here, i'm not an observer) point out quotes that you think they represent your view in the right way and i'll be happy to post them

...