Realm Reborn = downgrade?

[Ixmo]

being that mad someone implied you WhiteKnighted

Thank you for your criticism, added you in the OP.

Adding these types of comments to the OP clearly show how immature you're being to other people's opinions. You're definitely making this a one sided argument on the front page by adding what looks like mature and compelling arguments in favour of yourself and taking very small portions (including only a third of what I last posted, not displaying all of my argument) of what appear to be very weak arguments with attached hate for the opposing.

Also, yes, Square HAD to rebuild the entire engine from scratch, because otherwise they would never get the numbers required to make this game even partially a success. They have done nothing but lose a huge amount of money with 1.0 and no amounts of changes to the current engine would ever drastically increase subscription level. I think you need to take a step back and look at things from a clear perspective, because the way you're going on about things it's like you think 1.0 was a godsend of a game and didn't need to be changed in any way.

[lololink]

And good optimized graphism Starlord .
And these animation reality is not in that part of course

[Nemy]

Whos mad? You are the one attacking everyone that has a different opinion than you. Add me to the OP:

Well you do sound genuinely mad.

Attacking? I just posted a pretty picture of you on a white horse. I wouldn't call that an attack per se, more like an implication.

Honestly now, want me to keep or remove your post from the OP? You approach the issue from a very specific angle, that does no harm to be represented here.

[Starlord]

Honestly now, want me to keep or remove your post from the OP?

That sounds like a threat... " If you don't do what I say then Your words will be on my OP for All to see MUAHAHAHA" -.-

[neorei]

Well you do sound genuinely mad.

Attacking? I just posted a pretty picture of you on a white horse. I wouldn't call that an attack per se, more like an implication.

Honestly now, want me to keep or remove your post from the OP? You approach the issue from a very specific angle, that does no harm to be represented here.

well you are being critical on other people post and that whole picture of "white knighting" doesn't put a lot of maturity in your arguments. People are giving valid arguments to the way how SE are running things, but you go out there and say "oh look at all these white knights" as much you have the right to criticize SE way of doing things, they have a right to defend it.

[Nemy]

Adding these types of comments to the OP clearly show how immature you're being to other people's opinions. You're definitely making this a one sided argument on the front page by adding what looks like mature and compelling arguments in favour of yourself and taking very small portions (including only a third of what I last posted, not displaying all of my argument) of what appear to be very weak arguments with attached hate for the opposing.

Also, yes, Square HAD to rebuild the entire engine from scratch, because otherwise they would never get the numbers required to make this game even partially a success. They have done nothing but lose a huge amount of money with 1.0 and no amounts of changes to the current engine would ever drastically increase subscription level. I think you need to take a step back and look at things from a clear perspective, because the way you're going on about things it's like you think 1.0 was a godsend of a game and didn't need to be changed in any way.

Okay what the fuck. Now i'm the one being mad.

I added the last portion of your post because in my opinion it was summarising your view. Not to cut anything. You're being seriously unfair here.

As for AntonyB's post, shouldn't i be allowed to post it because its not exactly your approach on the subject? It is a different approach and has every right to be represented.

If you think i'm still being biased, (although i unavoidably am, since i represent a view here, i'm not an observer) point out quotes that you think they represent your view in the right way and i'll be happy to post them

...

[Elexia]

It's funny how people shit themselves out of blind fury when you ask them to use x MMO's feature, but will gladly praise SE for reducing animation quality lol. "White Knight" gets thrown around a lot, praising them for reducing animation quality is the equivalent of white knighting.

[Velhart]

Okay what the fuck. Now i'm the one being mad.

I added the last portion of your post because in my opinion it was summarising your view. Not to cut anything. You're being seriously unfair here.

As for AntonyB's post, shouldn't i be allowed to post it because its not exactly your approach on the subject? It is a different approach and has every right to be represented.

If you think i'm still being biased, (although i unavoidably am, since i represent a view here, i'm not an observer) point out quotes that you think they represent your view in the right way and i'll be happy to post them

...

Isn't it a tad wrong to make an organized two-sided argument when the OP is very biased on one side?

[lololink]

It's funny how people shit themselves out of blind fury when you ask them to use x MMO's feature, but will gladly praise SE for reducing animation quality lol. "White Knight" gets thrown around a lot, praising them for reducing animation quality is the equivalent of white knighting.

ANYone here say that SE is doing great thing with reducing animation quality .
They say that SE is doing great with having a better gameplay even if the animations suffers a little .

[Nemy]

well you are being critical on other people post and that whole picture of "white knighting" doesn't put a lot of maturity in your arguments. People are giving valid arguments to the way how SE are running things, but you go out there and say "oh look at all these white knights" as much you have the right to criticize SE way of doing things, they have a right to defend it.

I don't think there's more to his original post other than blindly praising the company and their decisions, while attacking us for "spamming complaints after complaints after complaints"

And yet NOBODY said a word for that blatant and needless attack, but instead you attack me, for posting a knight on a horse as a response.