Results 1 to 10 of 6254

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. 08-16-2012 04:39 AM #1
    LlenCoram
    Player
    LlenCoram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    1,593
    Character
    Llen Coram
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Fisher Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Antanias View Post
    Any comments on the jp side regarding the new 2.0 grass?
    fix'd(67890)



    (4)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 08-16-2012 04:40 AM #2
    Reinheart
    Player
    Reinheart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Subligania
    Posts
    5,831
    Character
    Reinheart Valentine
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 86
    Quote Originally Posted by LlenCoram View Post
    Any comments on the jp side regarding the new 2.0 grass?
    fix'd(67890)
    LOL nothing about the grass.... at least no on the JP side 'yet' lol 4:40AM in Japan atm

    Personally I'm more curious why the Treant mob is named Treant Sapling since if it's sapling I was kind of expecting more of this guy



    Unless they not showing new mob images yet
    (2)
    Last edited by Reinheart; 08-16-2012 at 04:44 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 08-16-2012 04:51 AM #3
    LlenCoram
    Player
    LlenCoram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    1,593
    Character
    Llen Coram
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Fisher Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Reinheart View Post
    LOL nothing about the grass.... at least no on the JP side 'yet' lol 4:40AM in Japan atm

    Personally I'm more curious why the Treant mob is named Treant Sapling since if it's sapling I was kind of expecting more of this guy



    Unless they not showing new mob images yet
    Haha, good. And I'm sorry to everyone who hates the word "grass" now. I couldn't resist.

    Maybe it's a sapling because that's as small as they come now. Maybe the real treants are now far larger?

    Another Make-Everything-Huge patch?!
    (1)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »