1.22 - 1.22a - 1.22b changes

[Aceofspades]

Well, all I'm saying is paladin is subpar. Argue whatever stance you'd like, be it mitigation or dps or hit points or enmity or self heals, paladin is just not as effective. For anyone to say it is as effective, or more, you're lying to yourself.

Sure Doctor Mog can put videos up of whatever to prove it can be done, it's still a lot easier to do with a warrior though.

lmao, soo because you say soo it is ? and no manner of proof means anything? and we are lying to ourselves? ..... OK!

[waldo]

lmao, soo because you say soo it is ? and no manner of proof means anything? and we are lying to ourselves? ..... OK!

No, not because I say it's so. It's because speed CC, speed AV, Garuda, 40,000 point hamlet defense runs, ect ect are all dominated by the tanking class: warrior.

I'm not mad about it. Most everything, including people, generally follow the path of least resistance. I don't blame anyone for going that route. I'm really not even a little upset, but why do people have so much of a problem calling a spade a spade? If it is easier to go warrior it's easier, what's wrong with saying paladin is not up to par with the current warrior class?

Is the community so afraid of the warrior nerf stick they'll play blind to the glaring differences? I dont need to prove a thing to you or anyone else, let the demographics do it. More often than not, these things are done (successfully) with the warrior as tank.

[Aceofspades]

No, not because I say it's so. It's because speed CC, speed AV, Garuda, 40,000 point hamlet defense runs, ect ect are all dominated by the tanking class: warrior.

I'm not mad about it. Most everything, including people, generally follow the path of least resistance. I don't blame anyone for going that route. I'm really not even a little upset, but why do people have so much of a problem calling a spade a spade? If it is easier to go warrior it's easier, what's wrong with saying paladin is not up to par with the current warrior class?

Is the community so afraid of the warrior nerf stick they'll play blind to the glaring differences? I dont need to prove a thing to you or anyone else, let the demographics do it. More often than not, these things are done (successfully) with the warrior as tank.

wait, we have proven it can be done on PLD ... , and you said it yourself, I know I have said it a million times, one of the biggest reasons people perfer WAR of PLD is because it is easier to do.... wich is fine with me, if you have no patience or the mental capacity to learn how to play PLD then go with war, I realy dont care, but you can not claim WAR is better simply because the majority is either too lazy or ignorant to learn to do PLD. WAR is a great tank soo long as there is no real risk to the tank as far as taking damage, lucky for WAR there is no real challange to test tanks, proof of that would be videos of tanks in reindeer suits tanking bosses or thms and whms tanking bosses. Dose not sound like a fight I would boast about. Soo in conclusion if you like to tank on WAR then go for it, I realy dont care, But I will always take less damage then you, hold hate well enough to tank anything you can tank and be more capable to remove the need for healers from a party, these , mind friend are all facts. Could I prove it? I'm sure I could but why?, you already said dr mog posted video of it being done and you still refute that. Soo in short , If I post somthing anymore in terms of video or parse It will be somthng worthy of noterity. But GL with tanking on your war, enjoy

[Aceofspades]

haha, I just saw that 40,000 point hamlet defense run part, omfg dont make me laugh, your or anyones war can not contribute anymore then a 50 crafter or gatherer on hamlet ....

[Rexus]

I don't think PLD is any harder than WAR lol. It has pretty much the same amount of hate tools, lower dps, and meh cures <_<. WAR is a better tank just for the fact it does good DPS while being able to keep hate off fully decked out Melees/BLMs, at least for me!