I'm going to have to disagree with this argument purely by stating the obvious opposite argument.

If your suggestion is entertained, then we will start having large FCs coming in here complaining that they have 30, 40, 100 man FCs that are constantly losing to 4 man FCs and how unfair that is. That they should be allowed to bid with all of their active members, and that allowing some small 4 man FC to have the same bidding power is unfair when they have 100 active members daily who have no house to hang out at.

The truth of the matter is, Carfoutis's argument is the better argument. Benefiting 100 people is a better net result than benefiting 4.

(As a related note, I notice a LOT of arguments on this housing forum are made by people that want changes that specifically benefit just them, but when analyzed as a whole, would hurt the large majority of player base. No change should ever be made that benefits a small number of people while hurting a much larger percentage of people. This suggestion is just another like that.)