Quote Originally Posted by Batbrat View Post
And it's not about your feelings at all either, but here we are.

Anyway, so we know that the argument for removing the genderlock entirely would be that in doing so, that would provide players with even more options for their video game characters glams.
Now, what is the actual argument against that?
Why should they NOT remove the genderlock from glams?
Why should players have less to choose from, why is more variety a bad idea?

Can you or anyone else give a straight forward on-topic answer that does not have any feelings, personal politics, or unconfirmable speculation?
Ok you wannna play that game? fine.


Now, what is the actual argument against that?
There are things that should hold some value, like 2B and or you know, the Brides outfit that is for Brides. And Males dont really should wear a Bikini... having unisex gear is boring, they make one gear for 4 thats easier to fit unlike cute or cool stuff that fits the gender. its 2x the work for the devs to make female & male versions and fix them to suit both, so overall wed just get less stuff and more neutral one... And there is tons of gear thats for both genders.

Why should they NOT remove the genderlock from glams?
Because for some gear it was there for a reason - for some it was just silly. But no you male roe should not wear Ryne's dress.

Why should players have less to choose from, why is more variety a bad idea?
Because its work that for huge parts trolls would use. Because if you want female cloths got play female in a fantasy game. Because it would be much more work for a very small % of players and as already said, ultimately would reduce the amount of already too few gear we'd get.

...but ik thats not good enough for you, so bye <3