Chaotic is midcore, in case you were wondering

[Supersnow845]

snip

BA’s length and coordinating spawning tristitia are functionally irrelevant to my overall point, when I say BA’s approx difficulty I basically mean it’s bosses. Amongst the 4/5 bosses there is 2 points of coordination

1) pulling art and owain at the same time which CLL and dal both also do so it doesn’t really count
2) ozma meteors and bleed baits

Meteors on ozma are really only a nightmare because ozma does black hole and you can’t easily rezz people. Dump off the weird rezz restrictions on BA and not have black hole end the instance and you would basically have what I consider the exact level of difficulty I want with this hypothesised content; which is basically also where the rough difficulty of the Diablo armament falls and launch orbornne as well

Saying “people who die and don’t contribute shouldn’t be babied” doesn’t really work in practice because the only way to deter that is body checks

Basically what I’m arguing for is the very top end of the most difficult alliance raids in diffciulty; BA in terms of its boss difficulty (not its coordination to spawn tristitia) as a template for rough difficulty


The reason extremes don’t fall into this despite not being mechanically much harder is for NA/EU they require time investment for strat arrangement and organisation within PF

[Reylap]

BA’s length and coordinating spawning tristitia are functionally irrelevant to my overall point, when I say BA’s approx difficulty I basically mean it’s bosses. Amongst the 4/5 bosses there is 2 points of coordination

1) pulling art and owain at the same time which CLL and dal both also do so it doesn’t really count
2) ozma meteors and bleed baits

Meteors on ozma are really only a nightmare because ozma does black hole and you can’t easily rezz people. Dump off the weird rezz restrictions on BA and not have black hole end the instance and you would basically have what I consider the exact level of difficulty I want with this hypothesised content; which is basically also where the rough difficulty of the Diablo armament falls and launch orbornne as well

Saying “people who die and don’t contribute shouldn’t be babied” doesn’t really work in practice because the only way to deter that is body checks

Basically what I’m arguing for is the very top end of the most difficult alliance raids in diffciulty; BA in terms of its boss difficulty (not its coordination to spawn tristitia) as a template for rough difficulty


The reason extremes don’t fall into this despite not being mechanically much harder is for NA/EU they require time investment for strat arrangement and organisation within PF

Again, you're using logic that you contradict yourselfs on your own sentence.
You said BA's lenght and coordination time are functionally irrelevant to your point (which is you defining what a midcore is).
and THEN you said at the end of the sentence that Extremes require time investment because you need to organize from PF (and you think organizing 56 people in BA is faster?) even though mechanically extreme is not that much harder.

???

What do you mean "people who die and don't contribute shouldn't be babied" doesn't work it practice? I already told you people being babied is the MAJORITY of this game. Hard body checks that makes prog multiple days or even months exist only in some savage floors and ultimates. Which we are already agree we consider those hardcores.

If you consider that the difficulty of BA or Diablo is "tough" difficulty, so how many times exactly that an average player need to "prog" it until it clears? 1 lockout? By that definition Alliance or Normal is midcore because you just need 1 lockout without any coordination at all and no communication. You get the occasional wipes when first launched. But you will clear it. The very top end of alliance difficulty is still CASUAL level of difficulty simply because the number of players in it. Your hypothetical content already exist in this game.

[Supersnow845]

Again, you're using logic that you contradict yourselfs on your own sentence.
You said BA's lenght and coordination time are functionally irrelevant to your point (which is you defining what a midcore is).
and THEN you said at the end of the sentence that Extremes require time investment because you need to organize from PF (and you think organizing 56 people in BA is faster?) even though mechanically extreme is not that much harder.

???

What do you mean "people who die and don't contribute shouldn't be babied" doesn't work it practice? I already told you people being babied is the MAJORITY of this game. Hard body checks that makes prog multiple days or even months exist only in some savage floors and ultimates. Which we are already agree we consider those hardcores.

If you consider that the difficulty of BA or Diablo is "tough" difficulty, so how many times exactly that an average player need to "prog" it until it clears? 1 lockout? By that definition Alliance or Normal is midcore because you just need 1 lockout without any coordination at all and no communication. You get the occasional wipes when first launched. But you will clear it. The very top end of alliance difficulty is still CASUAL level of difficulty simply because the number of players in it. Your hypothetical content already exist in this game.

Because I’m talking about difficulty of the bosses in BA, not the length of the raid because this isn’t necessarily something that’s being applied to another alliance raid. BA’s coordination and length aspect here doesn’t factor into it because I’m discussing the rough difficulty of the boss. I’m saying “I’d like an 8 man raid roughly as hard as ozma” for example, by that logic the coordination of BA to assemble it is irrelevant

Compare a normal raid as it stands in rough difficulty today to a normal raid with roughly ozma’s/AV’s difficulty. An actual enrage, mechanics that will straight up kill you like AV’s puddles. There is a big difference here while also still being well below a true extreme

You are fixating too much on BA as a complete duty from start to finish and not just its rough difficulty as a point of comparison which is what I’m arguing from. An 8 man duty with the difficulty of ozma would take more pulls to clear blind than any current 8 man, and an alliance raid made of “4 ozma’s” would probably need more than one lockout to clear blind but your probably only fail each boss once or twice

[Reylap]

Your original point was what does it mean by Midcore and you fixated on the boss difficulty instead of the overall aspect of the content.
I disagree with that kind of thinking, but let us play your argument a bit here.

You like an 8th man raid of roughly Ozma level of difficulty, which is exactly what a normal raid is considering that in Ozma level of difficulty, the difficulty is being masked by the fact that there are 56 players contribution to the raid.

Do you want more individual mechanics without any consequence of wiping like BA or Diablo? Yeah thats normal raids. Let me give you an example

1) P10 webs placement, tower dodging
2) E12 Titan Junction, Shiva Junction
3) M2 Lives, M3 dashes and movements
4) O5 trains, O6 paints, O3 Hali Maze

You want a mechanic that straight up kills you like AV's puddles and have some more actual enrage. Okay,

1) 4 lords Extremes are literall individual mechs that almost has no impact on the overall party.
2) Innocence
3) Valigarmanda literally only has 1 body check mech and thats the tank buster
4) All of endwalker extreme except golbez has no body checks and all individual mechs.
5) The entire Unreal content because people need to realize that majority of old trials mechs are made in an era where none of the jobs have this much leeway thanks to the amount of simplification.

Difficulty of an 8th man raid is depended on the consequences of someone dying because you rely on less people. Asking just to do BA without understanding that BA mechanics or Diablos mechanic condensed down to 8 people without any of the dead consequences is just asking for casual level raid. Because that is EXACTLY what they do to normal raids, they make Savage first, and then remove all the consequence of dying so you can clear it.

Which is your fixation on whatever true extreme is, is weird tbh because I have mentioned multiple times that extreme is doable blind in 2-3 lockout even if it had body check and someone else in this chat have already mentioned the variety of extremes that even sprouts can clear in 1-2 lockout.

[Supersnow845]

Your original point was what does it mean by Midcore and you fixated on the boss difficulty instead of the overall aspect of the content.
I disagree with that kind of thinking, but let us play your argument a bit here.

You like an 8th man raid of roughly Ozma level of difficulty, which is exactly what a normal raid is considering that in Ozma level of difficulty, the difficulty is being masked by the fact that there are 56 players contribution to the raid.

Do you want more individual mechanics without any consequence of wiping like BA or Diablo? Yeah thats normal raids. Let me give you an example

1) P10 webs placement, tower dodging
2) E12 Titan Junction, Shiva Junction
3) M2 Lives, M3 dashes and movements
4) O5 trains, O6 paints, O3 Hali Maze

You want a mechanic that straight up kills you like AV's puddles and have some more actual enrage. Okay,

1) 4 lords Extremes are literall individual mechs that almost has no impact on the overall party.
2) Innocence
3) Valigarmanda literally only has 1 body check mech and thats the tank buster
4) All of endwalker extreme except golbez has no body checks and all individual mechs.
5) The entire Unreal content because people need to realize that majority of old trials mechs are made in an era where none of the jobs have this much leeway thanks to the amount of simplification.

Difficulty of an 8th man raid is depended on the consequences of someone dying because you rely on less people. Asking just to do BA without understanding that BA mechanics or Diablos mechanic condensed down to 8 people without any of the dead consequences is just asking for casual level raid. Because that is EXACTLY what they do to normal raids, they make Savage first, and then remove all the consequence of dying so you can clear it.

Which is your fixation on whatever true extreme is, is weird tbh because I have mentioned multiple times that extreme is doable blind in 2-3 lockout even if it had body check and someone else in this chat have already mentioned the variety of extremes that even sprouts can clear in 1-2 lockout.

Ozma at 8 man without black hole/permadeath is nowhere near as easy as your average normal raid. Because normal raids have both no penalty and are mechanically simplistic. You can make a fight’s mechanics more difficult while still having zero external punishment to the rest of the group

If you want to argue that is basically an example of an easy end extreme (which going by something like innocence) it is. I’m not saying that extremes can’t be midcore content I’m saying that they need more content in this range that is organised so that NA doesn’t immediately dump it into PF and organise starts around something that doesn’t need strats (though to be fair that isn’t really the devs fault. Though they could hide content better like if they stuck innocence extreme into field content and just called it “innocence” people probably wouldn’t have PF’ed it)

Especially since they can’t actually make extremes a consistent difficulty. Innocence and SOS released basically half a year apart

[Reylap]

Ozma at 8 man without black hole/permadeath is nowhere near as easy as your average normal raid. Because normal raids have both no penalty and are mechanically simplistic. You can make a fight’s mechanics more difficult while still having zero external punishment to the rest of the group

If you want to argue that is basically an example of an easy end extreme (which going by something like innocence) it is. I’m not saying that extremes can’t be midcore content I’m saying that they need more content in this range that is organised so that NA doesn’t immediately dump it into PF and organise starts around something that doesn’t need strats (though to be fair that isn’t really the devs fault. Though they could hide content better like if they stuck innocence extreme into field content and just called it “innocence” people probably wouldn’t have PF’ed it)

Especially since they can’t actually make extremes a consistent difficulty. Innocence and SOS released basically half a year apart

And how do you give zero external punishment while making mechanics more difficult? You've been talking about Ozma as a way to put difficulty, but Ozma is literally 4 phase, with 1 or 2 short mechanics that are condensed into basically donuts/chariots, line aoes, and stack markers. The only argument of difficulty is the lack of cast bar for the attack and the speed of it. Which yeah, they have a lot of things like that in extreme without wiping the party

You seem to be forgetting the fact that FFXIV have instant raises that makes any sort of difficult mechanic without zero external consequences is basically a trivial thing. How do you solve difficult mech that doesnt punish players? Suicide it. Why do you think unsync O12S during SHB and EW is using the goodbye hello world strat? Why do you think extreme is still clearable with 5++ deaths?

Your argument of NA is a cultural thing. If you're saying the perception of NA players in PF are that they are unable to think outside of the common strats for something that doesnt need strat, then you're just saying skill issue because as data have mentioned in, JP players have no problem in clearing CAR. even in week 1 when theres no clear strats to use, most of em just wing it. And that is also a weird way of adjusting difficulty. "oh some players cant decide the strat to use, so lets make a content where strat isnt required but somehow we have to make it more difficult".

That is also not a problem of making consistent difficulty. It is HARD to make consistent difficulty precisely because difficulty is SUBJECTIVE and consistency is NOT always the goal to aim for. See how being consistent is shooting themselves in the foot now with MSQ? I rather them play around with variety and sometimes tuning it a bit skewed to the hard side rather than having the same slog consistently.

[Supersnow845]

snip

Is your only barometer for “difficulty” “I didnt affect my party”?

I think this is our fundamental difference here. Let’s take an easy extreme (just a theoretical easy extreme) and removed mechanics that required interaction with other players so at most you kill only yourself. At most you dying contributes to the enrage. Is there really “punishment”; not really because the healers are overflowing with mana. does that mean there isn’t difficulty; in my opinion there is still difficulty because I failed the mechanic and died and i myself want the joy of doing the fight flawlessly even if if I messed it up it wouldn’t affect anyone else anyway besides the enrage

If you think that anything that makes it so that the only punishment falls on yourself constitutes a lack of difficulty then that’s fine; it’s a perfectly valid stance to have. But it’s not the stance I have.

I’d like to not be put to sleep in content that sits somewhere around a ozma without group punishment (which yes ozma has 5 defined phases don’t worry I can call ozma you don’t have to explain him to me) because he is still relatively mechanically fast, doesn’t have tells and does a lot of damage if you don’t have 5/2 or are in defensive. 9 extremes out of 10 have at least one if not more body checks and at least one mechanic that is solved with a standardised start. There is a range that exists where you pretty much don’t kill the party without a defined strat but is harder than an average normal raid (if shiva was the easiest normal rather than the hardest this would be more in what I’m asking for)

You are right my argument for NA is subjective cultural differences but this entire debate about midcore is borne from exactly that cultural subjectivity