The issue with Dawntrail and importance of 8.0

[Archeron]

I didn't ask anyone to be constructive with me and I didn't ask why are people here so rude. (I already know why.) I've been pointing out how people are being rude and in response people continue to be rude. Which is pretty funny.

Btw your post has the air of that meme "it's too late, I have already depicted you as a feeble victim and myself as the noble chad" which is really entertaining given your ongoing behavior. That said, I don't think it really contributed to the topic of this thread. Please let's get back on topic for the next one.

You claim "Hey! I'm being attacked! It's rude! It's mean! It's not constructive!"

You have been dismissing people throughout this thread. They present facts, you refuse to acknowledge them. You dismiss what they are saying because you percieve the tone of their posts to be "negative, rude, unconstructive." While being Just as obnoxious in response to them. If you want to play the "Bigger person" you shouldn't even be engaging with them at all. Instead, you're deliberately fanning the flames of all the people who you percieve as "rude, unconstructive, ect" by calling them out and wording your posts with such a pretentious, and haughty tone.



Honestly I would think you're just here to troll at this point instead of having a productive conversation with anyone here.

[Exmo]

They present facts, you refuse to acknowledge them.

When someone has presented a fact I have addressed it. Typically their interpretation of the fact is not my interpretation of the fact and I disagree with their interpretation. Not agreeing with an interpretation is not the same as dismissing it. I don't engage with every point thrown my way but nobody here does.

I don't think I've called anyone here "unconstructive". I don't know why you brought up being constructive several times like that as if that's something I'm asking people to be.

I'm not going to engage with anything else in your post because you're being rude !! In your post you said it's best not to engage with rude comments because then I'd be the bigger person, but tbh I've been openly sticking to that policy for a while now and you chastised me for it and called it dismissive. I'm not sure what you want so I'm going to forge my own path !!

Anyway once again to get back on topic, Dawntrail was great. I like the trajectory the story took and the feeling of unease surrounding certain elements that remain in the story (the endless, the regulators, the key). I would have liked that unease to be greater emphasized in the climax of 7.0 but I'm glad 7.1 is jumping right back into it.

[Archeron]

When someone has presented a fact I have addressed it. Typically their interpretation of the fact is not my interpretation of the fact and I disagree with their interpretation. Not agreeing with an interpretation is not the same as dismissing it. I don't engage with every point thrown my way but nobody here does.

I don't think I've called anyone here "unconstructive". I don't know why you brought up being constructive several times like that as if that's something I'm asking people to be.

I'm not going to engage with anything else in your post because you're being rude !! In your post you said it's best not to engage with rude comments because then I'd be the bigger person, but tbh I've been openly sticking to that policy for a while now and you chastised me for it and called it dismissive. I'm not sure what you want so I'm going to forge my own path !!

Anyway once again to get back on topic, Dawntrail was great. I like the trajectory the story took and the feeling of unease surrounding certain elements that remain in the story (the endless, the regulators, the key). I would have liked that unease to be greater emphasized in the climax of 7.0 but I'm glad 7.1 is jumping right back into it.

If you're not going to engage with my post because it was rude why did you reply into the first place? Just proving my point about your real intentions here.

You sure this isn't... to quote a favorite phrase you like to use... your own "reading comprehension" issue?

I pointed out why two communties were fighting, (On a seperate thread) and multiple people took that as me suggesting a course of action, like that the Hardcore players should be responsible for carrying casuals, and that I somehow wanted harder content to be deleted. Reading comprehension = Still a problem.

[Lilapop]

If you're not going to engage with my post because it was rude why did you reply into the first place? Just proving my point about your real intentions here.

If they're replying to your post, that is the engagement. Replying is engagement. Reading comprehension, anyone?

[Supersnow845]

If they're replying to your post, that is the engagement. Replying is engagement. Reading comprehension, anyone?

Replying to a post saying “not engaging with that” is not engagement just because they technically replied to your comment

What a pointless distinction

[Lilapop]

Replying to a post saying “not engaging with that” is not engagement just because they technically replied to your comment

What a pointless distinction

If it's still fostering conversation (which, in this context, it clearly is) that is engagement.

[Lilapop]

You have been dismissing people throughout this thread. They present facts, you refuse to acknowledge them.

You sure this isn't... to quote a favorite phrase you like to use... your own "reading comprehension" issue?