Are we destroying "our own" game?

[KisaiTenshi]

this... so much this. it would have been awesome if we could have joined in on the train and actually SHOT AT THINGS. but then, I suppose this can be excused for the "accessibility" rant because people are too incompetent at high level in a VIDEO GAME to be able to hit anything.

not to mention, they could have given a choice to assist with cooking, with a good or bad outcome, if you were a culinarian, it could have enhanced it one way, if you werent, could have added a "surprising taste" since all that was required was learning the local customs. honestly, the people pressing for "accessibility" clearly cant see any way it could be done properly that actually allows everyone to still do it while making the story better.

Considering we have "Trusts" for multiplayer content, just stick a "trust" system in place with three options:

"I want to do this minigame (Cul LV 90 required)"
"I want (NPC name) to do this minigame for me"
"I want (NPC name) to do this minigame (RP)" (Normal/Easy)

Problem solved. Then just write the story reflecting how you both did it. This would at least offer the OPTION to do it, and not just fade to black.

Same with the train in DT, could we not... sit in a gunner seat and fire at targets or something? Like there is an entire minigame in the golden saucer that does this.

[Kes13a]

Considering we have "Trusts" for multiplayer content, just stick a "trust" system in place with three options:

"I want to do this minigame (Cul LV 90 required)"
"I want (NPC name) to do this minigame for me"
"I want (NPC name) to do this minigame (RP)" (Normal/Easy)

Problem solved. Then just write the story reflecting how you both did it. This would at least offer the OPTION to do it, and not just fade to black.

Same with the train in DT, could we not... sit in a gunner seat and fire at targets or something? Like there is an entire minigame in the golden saucer that does this.

yeah, MAJOR lost opportunity there in my opinion...