People that say dungeons are too easy...

[Shurrikhan]

Either way, the solution is to give people that want hard stuff other stuff to do, not to make MSQ harder.

I have to slightly disagree, depending on what we mean by "harder".

I don't think MSQ should be much more punishing (except where whole mechanics are merely a tickle), and certainly shouldn't be any less intuitive or even much more complicated in what places complexity exists. But, it should have at least a bit more opportunity for engagement, which may in some cases require things not being so negligible. And it definitely shouldn't forbid trash from becoming more than a mindless slog.

The occasional wipe.. is fine. That said, I would much rather have wipes to a boss respawn us right in front of that boss room. I also wouldn't mind letting anyone rez in those dungeons (a la pre-Savage V&D-Ds). Heck, I wouldn't mind seeing Echo (purged upon killing the given boss), if it came down to it.

Would also give several limbs (not necessarily my own, but surely the thought still counts) for proportionately greater reward for Minimum Item Level runs.

And, tbh, I'd love it with made the max ilvl for content equal to or barely greater than that content's drops, so we can actually have a decent experience both on content drop and months later, with less merely/purely gear-dependent gaps on content for which that gear makes no difference except in providing unnecessary/excessive speed (reward per minute already being tuned basically around min ilvl). Because I'm a sadist, I guess.

Criterion (three paths, the standard solo/friends group thing now), Variant (the hard one, roulette will pick a path for you, quing regular lets your party pick the path they want)

...Isn't this the opposite? I could have sworn the one with variable pathing is Variant. The one originally suggested to have a psuedo-scoring system based around certain criteria is... Criterion.

If what you want to spread is the branching paths system (what you're calling "Criterion" here but I thought was "Variant"), not the single-path harder mode, then it wouldn't be nearly so easy to implement over existing dungeons and would require sacrificing much of their aesthetic cohesion and uniqueness as they nearly "Aquapolis-ify" those environments.

The problem comes from having to run them over and over for tomes since they're the most efficient way of getting them.

And there's the kicker: Make its rewards per minute less OP (by bringing the grind time per week required through other content down or bringing Expert Roulette's up to their times required) and there's a lot less pressure on dungeon design and play, both, to degenerate with all possible haste. Heck, balance Hunts, too, and you might even have *gasp*, something much more closely approximating actual content choice even when playing with few hours per week while wanting to fully progress or otherwise having the efficiency-itchies.
_____________
A quick aside:

Wait...what?

Trash - when doing wall-to-wall pulls - is the only thing threatening in dungeons. Tanks have to be more spot on in their defensive CD cycling and when DPSers aren't pulling their weight, it's more noticeable and Tanks can run out of defensives and see their health go to danger zone extremely quickly on big pulls.

And is a wall-to-wall pull a single trash pack? Would you similarly be (still pretty easily) able to take on 3 bosses simultaneously?

Any why must three packs worth of trash collectively still have fewer mechanics/mechanical involvements than even a single (still fairly barren) boss? The only gameplay possible from them is entirely based on tuning relative to tank/healer sustain (since, yes, the DPS necessary is likewise dependent on the dynamics of tank/healer sustain -- aiming to kill before all resources are depleted), rather than offering anything original.

If the interest is in "doing more" with trash, then simply amping their tuning so that one is exposed to even less mechanical depth at a time clearly was not the intention.

[Renathras]

Even at level cap, dungeon trash is only about one step up from being the easiest thing to confront in this game.

Wait...what?

Trash - when doing wall-to-wall pulls - is the only thing threatening in dungeons. Tanks have to be more spot on in their defensive CD cycling and when DPSers aren't pulling their weight, it's more noticeable and Tanks can run out of defensives and see their health go to danger zone extremely quickly on big pulls.

Granted, this is just because of the unavoidable damage of a dozen enemies all beating on one person, but watch a Tank's health in a dungeon run sometime. You'll notice it being much more accordian-like on the trash pulls than the bosses in Expert roulette. Other than SPECIFICALLY tankbusters or the Tank standing in bad - that is, assuming in both cases the Tank is avoiding all avoidable damage - the Tanks' health will be going up and down a lot more wildly during the trash than any of the current bosses. Trash isn't interesting, but it's more deadly than bosses at this point. Take from that what you will.

As to the plausible - I disagree. The Devs have taken dungeons to the state they're in deliberately. It IS their intent. The proof is in the live-game: They literally added Criterion (with three difficulties) instead of increasing the difficulty of dungeons. They've already done the thing you are saying is less plausible than the thing you're asking to do, which is something they've explicitly done the opposite of.

Considering roulettes are how people gear who aren't doing Savages, you're not going to end up in a situation (at least not unless there's some huge shift that Yoshi P has given exactly zero indication of) where the roulette/MSQ dungeons are harder. Your best hope IS an additional roulette.

I have to slightly disagree, depending on what we mean by "harder".

Semantics. While "harder" is definitely an open-ended term, "harder than now" is pretty obvious. Additional complexity, damage, anything that reduces the odds of success vs the status quo. What IS a more complex concept to nail down is the one you used, "more opportunity for engagement". What does that MEAN? How do you do that in a way that a hyper-casual player WON'T see it as being harder? And WHY do you need that in MSQ dungeons SPECIFICALLY instead of in other content? Why SPECIFICALLY do MSQ dungeons/roulette need to be the thing changed?

"The occasional wipe.. is fine" - TO YOU. But not to everyone. (That said, I do agree resawning at the dungeon start and the "shortcut" always taking you to the prior boss room is kind of stupid.)

As for the side conversation: Criterion is the "base" version, right? That's what I was quing up and running solo earlier to unlock more of the paths alone. I've never done the Variant, though I notice the tab has only "Variant Raise" as the duty action...? So I assumed that was the medium one (as I haven't done any of those, I haven't unlocked the "Another" savage versions).

But as I say, which is harder to do per patch, make an entire dungeon and an entire SECOND dungeon with 3 difficulties, or make ONE dungeon with 4 difficulties? It seems to me the latter requires less work, since the "new" difficulty is on the bottom end and so would be the least dev resource intensive thing to do, not to mention save on asset, art, and mechanics designs of having to come up with things for the other dungeon. NOT ONLY THAT, it would actually mean if the casual player ever DID want to step up to the next difficulty, they would be familiar with some of the base mechanics (less punishing due to less damaging and longer time to identify and react to them), so this would actually help with that "casuals need to be taught mechanics so they can do harder stuff" thing.

.

As for the end:

That's my point. And no, you don't need to make things more painful for casual players. As I say, make other things worth the tomes on an equal basis per average time investment. If the "hardcore" players then do the Expert anyway because it's faster (and easier), then they forfeit the right to complain about it since they have the harder alternative and are choosing to avoid it themselves.

[Shurrikhan]

Semantics. While "harder" is definitely an open-ended term, "harder than now" is pretty obvious.

Not merely semantics. There's "harder" as in "more to do", and there's "harder" as in reduced leniency. While both may contribute, they encounter diminishing returns separately.

Which was clearly the point -- the source and manner of difficulty, not merely the amount. As you clearly noticed from the other parts in that comment, so I'm not sure why you're portraying it in this way, short of just being rhetorically disingenuous?

Additional complexity, damage, anything that reduces the odds of success vs the status quo

That status quo which itself broke multiple status quos to make things as negligible as they are now?

[Mayhemmer]

Wait...what?

I'll simplify. I don't like criterion. It's too many steps above what I'm looking for, hence why I pointed out the devs having issues when making these steps in difficulty. I don't want criterion dungeons, I just want regular dungeons to have better trash. That's it. That's all I want. It's been done, I want it to be done more often. The challenge current dungeon trash provides is artificial in that you have to pull disconnected packs of mobs to even get to that point.

I don't want every one group of mobs to hit with the strength of multiple groups of mobs, for every group, in every dungeon. I want single packs of mobs to have more mechanics than just "vomits AoE at your feet" more often. I don't care if that's too much for the ever-nebulous "casuals" demographic.

[Ardeth]

I'll simplify. I don't like criterion. It's too many steps above what I'm looking for, hence why I pointed out the devs having issues when making these steps in difficulty. I don't want criterion dungeons, I just want regular dungeons to have better trash. That's it. That's all I want. It's been done, I want it to be done more often. The challenge current dungeon trash provides is artificial in that you have to pull disconnected packs of mobs to even get to that point.

I don't want every one group of mobs to hit with the strength of multiple groups of mobs, for every group, in every dungeon. I want single packs of mobs to have more mechanics than just "vomits AoE at your feet" more often. I don't care if that's too much for the ever-nebulous "casuals" demographic.

That's the biggest thing. I'm for that, but stop making the dungeons hallways. Stop prioritizing speed clears. I want to do harder things. I want to do more challenging things, but that crowd of people are so damn uninviting. They will cry and moan until you can still grab the packs to the wall and aoe them down. And you know what? I don't find that interaction remotely interesting. It was interesting before because the game wasn't designed for it. Pushing wall to wall and healing it was a skill. Now it's the bottom level. If you can't do that, then you have no business queing, which is just absolutely stupid. Dungeons are such toxicity traps now. I did a snow cloak the other day, and I was healing. The tank was pulling wall to wall, and the dps weren't aoeing. I don't know why they weren't, but the tank threw a hissy fit and left. Leaving me the healer to have to heal two dps who didn't aoe. And what made it worse is he left after one pack, and we didn't get a new tank until the final boss. Which was fine. Healing is dirt easy, but he left because his style of play wasn't placated to, and I just adapted to it and tried to make the best of it. I just don't see a world where the meta isn't going to suck out the fun of your new tougher trash as well. Because the current dungeons are just boring enemy funneling tunnels. It's just a snooze fest all the way around.

[Mayhemmer]

I'm for that, but stop making the dungeons hallways. Stop prioritizing speed clears.

This, too.

[Ardeth]

This, too.

The players do that. To be fair when all you care about is the reward that is the outcome.