Results 1 to 10 of 1821

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Connor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    2,166
    Character
    Connor Whelan
    World
    Odin
    Main Class
    Bard Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by BRVV View Post
    If you change a bunch of abilities, a real rework than someone's old rotation and buttons don't work anymore. What is there not to get? Are you dense?
    If this is honestly what you think people have asked for you need to re-read this thread lol.

    Returning pre-existing abilities that content can be completed with or without does not affect MSQ-only players. In case you haven’t noticed, healers aren’t actually asking for dps-level rotations or difficulty levels. Nor would the majority of the things people have asked for - SCH DoTs, WHM’s Aero III, etc, - actually affect the job’s ‘rotation’ or any of their already existing buttons.
    (3)
    Last edited by Connor; 09-04-2023 at 11:51 PM.

  2. #2
    Player
    BRVV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Location
    The fallen city of Insomnia
    Posts
    1,009
    Character
    Viz Vale
    World
    Spriggan
    Main Class
    Sage Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Connor View Post
    If this is honestly what you think people have asked for you need to re-read this thread lol.

    Returning [i] pre-existing [i/] abilities that content can be completed with or without does not affect MSQ-only players. In case you haven’t noticed, healers aren’t actually asking for dps-level rotations or difficulty levels.
    Ok you misunderstand everything i say. Great. I SAID SQUARE ENIX USES NOT MAKING CASUALS CONFUSED AS AN ARGUMENT TO NOT TO MAKE TOO MANY CHANGES DURING A EXPANSION. Got it now? I never said anything about what healers want???

    I also don't get where you get those "extra buttons" rederick from. I don't know why this 148 pages topic is EXCLUSIVELY on returning old abilties for you??? And what should those abilites even be that don't affect gameplay apparently? A second DOT for scholar maybe? Bringing that back?
    (1)
    Will put you on ignore if you can't form a logical argument but argue nonetheless