Nor did I remotely imply it was. Not really the point I was making at all. The rightness or wrongness of the positions being espoused really isn't important for our context here, at least for the time being.
Besides, most of what gets discussed about Endwalker is subjective anyway. For example, let's say I take a look at Zenos and go, "he was a really messed up dude." That would be an opinion I've formed based on information provided to me by the story, yes? If that opinion is not rooted in facts provided by the story, sure, it could be wrong in the sense that it was spawned by a lack of understanding. But what if it isn't? What if that opinion is rooted firmly in the information provided by the game and other canon sources? Suddenly it's a lot harder to say it's objectively wrong. Someone could disagree with it, but that wouldn't make it objectively wrong. The difference between not agreeing with something and it being objectively wrong is rather significant.



Reply With Quote





