Data from lucky bancho about participation in field content

[Supersnow845]

Participation doesn't equal popularity, liked or even good content.

People still play healers doesn't mean healer design is great.

People still do pvp, doesn't mean pvp design is great because to this day a good number rof them just half ass there way through for the daily rewards.

Or when they do something like add fates to relic steps... every one hates fates but still does them..

It's all to laborious.

There was a stipulation there that when I said “like” I meant “engaged enough with to gain something out of”, I apparently was not clear on that, when I said I have no idea how square thinks people didn’t like field content I meant “I have no idea how square saw that 50% of people who unlocked Bozja got RR 25 and still decided to not make more” because for literally any content it’s extremely difficult to determine satisfaction beyond level of interaction

We still even argue on here if healers are actually bad or if this is an echo chamber (for example), if we can’t even agree on healer design how can square do much more than associate interaction with use