Quick question:
Was WMH's SB rotation acceptable for a modern Healer?
(Some of you know where I'm going with this, but I'm just curious...)
Quick question:
Was WMH's SB rotation acceptable for a modern Healer?
(Some of you know where I'm going with this, but I'm just curious...)


Whether I think it was acceptable or not is neither here nor there because it had the bad-lily system. To say 'WHM SB but with the Misery system too' is something I can't speak for because it didn't exist, and is just theorycraft. I'd like to think that it would be decent enough though. Filler, DOT, Assize, Aero-3 can be thought of as a Phlegma of sorts, and then Misery, especially now that it's damage neutral.
Rather than asking 'is it acceptable for a modern healer', consider that the nonhealer classes have had 4 years of evolution upon 'their' SB version. The answer to the question then is another question: 'was WHM's SB damage rotation a good baseline to build off of going into SHB', to which I'd say the answer is 'yeh, if you fix the trash lily system it had potential'. After all, having 'an extra GCD (Aero3/Banish) that you use every (24/15) seconds' and 'a DOT (Aero2/Rescaled-Dia) that you use every (18/12)' is not exactly too far from one another in terms of design space, only in terms of numerical balance, so it'd be a bit hypocritical of me to say something quite similar to my own design idea is 'not acceptable', instead I'll just say it was an acceptable baseline to add 4 years of fixes and additions to, like the other roles got
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote



