


Why do you think it's a 1.0 reference?My reason for choosing to ignore this part of the lore is because it's dropped so flippantly despite having insanely far-reaching implications, for what seems to so far just amount to a 1.0 reference. With how much effort there clearly is put into Primal lore and with how cohesive it is thematically, this just sticks out like a sore thumb. I of course don't have access to the writers' heads here, but it just feels like so little thought went into it, so I will also give it very little consideration myself.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote

