Quote Originally Posted by Sebazy View Post
I still think the initial mistake was genuine. Logs can be tough to read and this is just one silly facet of it.

Trying to downplay numbers to mask the extent of the difference despite being handed clear and obvious math beyond a decimal point is just a show of the true colours though. It's not 5-15%, it's not 10-20%, it's literally 13.5% to 22.2%. I merrily wager that these 'margins of error' would be on the opposite side of the true values if the shoe was on the other foot for this one. I'm sure this is all hyperbole though
Imagine if someone from 'the other side' had interpreted that range as '20%-30% faster', still the same 'only 2% of the actual range falls in the stated range' and 'range stated spans a gap of 10%', just on the other side of the scale