On question 4, I would've gone with referencing tank DPS rotations instead of rotations on the level as the DPS role. I have never seen a single person claim they wanted the healers to have DPS rotations on the same level of action volume or complexity as any of the DPS classes. I think you asked before about if people here would enjoy a healer that had SMN's DPS rotation, and many said they'd be fine with that, but it's not want anyone has directly asked for or said the healers need. It's kinda like this... If you were looking at investment to start your business, let's say you ask for $500,000 as investment. If the investor offers you $5,000,000 dollars with no strings attached, then yeah, you're absolutely going to take that offer, but you were neither expecting, asking for, or needing that much capital. So sure, some people might go "yeah, that could be cool. I'd enjoy that," but I don't' think any of them would've asked for that specifically if given the opportunity to question the combat design team or anything.

That said, something several of us have mentioned and actively discuss is having the healers have the same level of action volume and complexity of the tanks. That's more realistic of an ask since Tanks are the other half of the "support roles" and also do not have "dealing damage" as their primary responsibility. Perhaps you could have phrased it more like:

"How would you feel if the healers received a DPS rotation on par with the Tank role while still juggling your healing duties? Should healers go even further than that?"

That would still leave the door open to discuss going farther than tank rotations toward DPS rotations, but you'd be setting the expectation a lot closer to something more reflective of what this community on the forums wants, or at least, a chunk of us.