Quote Originally Posted by Zebraoracle View Post
If they added after your quote, then sure, my bad. Still doesn't change much.

I like how you're also ignoring the fact that I said I differentiate between casual and toxic casual, when there's a very clear difference. Someone who's bad and trying? Not a toxic casual. I'd appreciate it if you didn't lump me and other people in the pro-parsing argument in with the likes of Firemage when there's a very clear distinction between our stances, thanks. I'd like to believe you have enough sense to know not everyone is Firemage.

The thread is quite literally full of people who mald and obsess over the idea of parses being added, on the anti-parse side, too. And most of their arguments have been very... not good, sooo...

And once again I ask, why is this an all or nothing situation? Ikara said it, I've said it, we don't necessarily need parsers in dungeons/normal trials/normal raids. Why are we arguing like this is all or nothing when the possibility of adding hypotheticals to this hypothetical argument exists?
I'm honestly getting pretty confused here. People have been presenting an in-game meter like it's some kind of answer to 'toxic casuals'.

Do you encounter a lot of 'toxic casuals' refusing to carry their weight in high-end content? Wouldn't restricting the meter to high-end content only make it kind of useless for combating toxic casualism?