


Probably he learned that investing his face publicly when the real decisions are taken elsewhere is not a good idea.
I don't have a natural admiration for Tanaka, but I seriously doubt that the decisions that most drastically impacted FFXIV in a negative way were his or majorly his.
Tanaka was the producer. While every company has a different definition of what a producer is, I know for a fact that in SE a producer doesn't cover the role of a game director as well, and still has to bow to executive decisions.
The community doesn't need to be stirred up more than it is. Thinking that some of the basic areas of this game have merit and should be preserved doesn't mean needing to be "stirred up".
Also, there's a big difference between "stirring up" and intentionally spreading negativity and FUD, every single day, always looking for (often completely out of line, like in this case) excuses to do so, without a single spec of constructiveness.
Game development needs constructive feedback, and that's what the forums are for. Self elected robin hoods should learn that stay in sherwood. Overdramatized support posts don't really make their methods any less disruptive.
Last edited by Abriael; 03-30-2011 at 07:01 AM.


The last part of your post basically is what I tried to say in my post above and I totally agree with you.Probably he learned that investing his face publicly when the real decisions are taken elsewhere is not a good idea.
I don't have a natural admiration for Tanaka, but I seriously doubt that the decisions that most drastically impacted FFXIV in a negative way were his or majorly his.
Tanaka was the producer. While every company has a different definition of what a producer is, I know for a fact that in SE a producer doesn't cover the role of a game director as well, and still has to bow to executive decisions.
The community doesn't need to be stirred up more than it is. Thinking that some of the basic areas of this game have merit and should be preserved doesn't mean needing to be "stirred up".
Also, there's a big difference between "stirring up" and intentionally spreading negativity and FUD, every single day, always looking for (often completely out of line, like in this case) excuses to do so, without a single spec of constructiveness.
Game development needs constructive feedback, and that's what the forums are for. Self elected robin hoods should learn that stay in sherwood.


We shall have to agree to disagree then, my good man. You are entitled to your opinion as am I, I shall not attempt to argue for my opinion seeing as doing so generally just makes everyone else entrench further in their folly. However, I am of the opinion that self-elected Robin Hoods are awesome. You would prefer a "Robin Hood" that was elected by popular vote?
The community doesn't need to be stirred up more than it is. Thinking that some of the basic areas of this game have merit and should be preserved doesn't mean needing to be "stirred up".
Also, there's a big difference between "stirring up" and intentionally spreading negativity and FUD, every single day, always looking for (often completely out of line, like in this case) excuses to do so, without a single spec of constructiveness.
Game development needs constructive feedback, and that's what the forums are for. Self elected robin hoods should learn that stay in sherwood. Overdramatized support posts don't really make their methods any less disruptive.
"Intentionally Spreading Negativity" I suppose a great many "Muckrakers" did that as well. The general consensus was they needed to "quiet down". The overarching theme of history at large is people forget the bad things if they're idle enough.
Is that good? Subjective. Is that bad? Subjective.
Also, for someone who loves the tar out of subjectivity a statement such as "Game development needs constructive feedback, and that's what the forums are for." Seems highly suspect. I mean, who am I or who are you to say what these forums are for? Maybe they're to gauge player attitudes? Maybe they're to lighten SE's countenance?
I don't know. People should say that more often because it sure as heck is true of far more people than would ever admit it.



No, I would prefer people with a constructive and actually useful attitude over glorified thievesWe shall have to agree to disagree then, my good man. You are entitled to your opinion as am I, I shall not attempt to argue for my opinion seeing as doing so generally just makes everyone else entrench further in their folly. However, I am of the opinion that self-elected Robin Hoods are awesome. You would prefer a "Robin Hood" that was elected by popular vote?
The small detail you're not noticing is that the forums definitely aren't idle. There are hundreds of posts bursting full with suggestions and requests for changes. So people simply aren not "idle enough". No one here needs a muckracker to tell him that this game needs to evolve, if you didn't notice. Further stirring isn't needed, as much as some are quite evidently convinced that they know better than everyone else."Intentionally Spreading Negativity" I suppose a great many "Muckrakers" did that as well. The general consensus was they needed to "quiet down". The overarching theme of history at large is people forget the bad things if they're idle enough.
Sorry mate, this is game development, not politics.
The rules of the forums establish what these forums are for, as the various developer posts about it. Guess what? they all talk about constructiveness, respect (which includes first and foremost respect for the development team) and similar concepts. There's nothing subjective about that.Also, for someone who loves the tar out of subjectivity a statement such as "Game development needs constructive feedback, and that's what the forums are for." Seems highly suspect. I mean, who am I or who are you to say what these forums are for? Maybe they're to gauge player attitudes? Maybe they're to lighten SE's countenance?
There are already plenty MMOs on the market, one of which is more dangerous to FFXIV (and to any other) than any other "AAA" MMO out there (quotes obligatory, since only SWTOR is actually classifiable as "AAA", and the sci-fi crowd is quite disjoined from the Final Fantasy one).
There's no ticking clock. As much as other MMOs will influence FFXIV, FFXIV's releases will influence them (if they're good) in turn. That's how the market works.
And none of them will influence the others as much as the sole presence of WoW (and the release of any of it's major patches or expansions) does.
Last edited by Abriael; 03-30-2011 at 07:28 AM.
So you think loosing a big chunk of what is left on FFXIV population wont matter ?There's no ticking clock. As much as other MMOs will influence FFXIV, FFXIV's releases will influence them (if they're good) in turn. That's how the market works.
And none of them will influence the others as much as the sole presence of WoW (and the release of any of it's major patches or expansions) does.
because lets face it , a good MMO comes out people will go and play it.
Somewhat i find that hard to believe.



ANY game will lose a chunk of it's population every time another game is released. Even WoW, mind you. To think that developers should burn their chances to improve the game because they need to make haste and beat other games to the market is simply to deny the nature of the gaming market.
I'm sure that you understand that the fact that you may be able to find higher level people that may(or may not) agree with your ideas doesn't change the fact that you didn't experience what you're talking about, ergo, your opinion isn't founded on anything else that banter on a forum. Experience it, then judge. It's pretty simple and trying to change subject won't change that.Zkieve, seeing as how you are a rank 50, may I ask your opinion on the current Class system and Battle system?
How do you feel about party tactics? Individuality? Challenge?
Some are of the opinion that being rank 15, I cannot have a valid opinion of battle in FFXIV.
Personally I can say that tanking in FFXIV is one of the mist fun and challenging experiences in a MMO to date. The only system I liked more was in Age of Conan before Funcom dumbed it down to appease those that couldn't master it.
Considering how many i see that, even at level 50, can't hold aggro for the life of them, and stubbornly refuse to use most of the tools they have at their hand to ensure just that, I wouldn't be surprised if quite a lot of people simply didn't even get a small part of the combat system.
I see too many tanks that are absolute trainwrecks around me to exclude that very solid possibility.
Last edited by Abriael; 03-30-2011 at 07:47 AM.


You DO NOT KNOW if that is going to happen. That is what I am trying to tell you and the others that think like you. You are just guessing. You are trying to present your opinion as a fact. I do not see any MMORPG that will be released in 2011 that can have a really big impact on the playerbase of FFXIV.
The whole the clock is ticking thing is as valid as me saying FFXIV will beat WoW when the PS3 version is released, because Square Enix is cool and WoW has no moogles.
Most people that would leave FFXIV already left. The few left understand what SE has to do and are waiting for Yoshi to fix the game. The problem is not SE or FFXIV. The problem is a small part of the current player base that do not understand that developing a game and changing the very basics of the game play take some time ...
They are not going to add or remove a small thing. They are talking about redoing whole maps, fixing the battle mechanics and redoing whole class balancing. That is not doable in a week, a month or even a few months ... it takes time. Give it time ...
A few weeks ago everyone was so damn happy about RIFT. RIFT was so cool, so new, so polished ... and so boring because it is a WoW copy. It only took them a few days to come back and troll the FFXIV forums instead of playing their beloved RIFT.
The coming MMOs will do as much damage as RIFT did to FFXIV, which is almost none ...
So you think wow is the only choice of mmos over games such as GW2?You DO NOT KNOW if that is going to happen. That is what I am trying to tell you and the others that think like you. You are just guessing. You are trying to present your opinion as a fact. I do not see any MMORPG that will be released in 2011 that can have a really big impact on the playerbase of FFXIV.
The whole the clock is ticking thing is as valid as me saying FFXIV will beat WoW when the PS3 version is released, because Square Enix is cool and WoW has no moogles.
Most people that would leave FFXIV already left. The few left understand what SE has to do and are waiting for Yoshi to fix the game. The problem is not SE or FFXIV. The problem is a small part of the current player base that do not understand that developing a game and changing the very basics of the game play take some time ...
They are not going to add or remove a small thing. They are talking about redoing whole maps, fixing the battle mechanics and redoing whole class balancing. That is not doable in a week, a month or even a few months ... it takes time. Give it time ...
A few weeks ago everyone was so damn happy about RIFT. RIFT was so cool, so new, so polished ... and so boring because it is a WoW copy. It only took them a few days to come back and troll the FFXIV forums instead of playing their beloved RIFT.
The coming MMOs will do as much damage as RIFT did to FFXIV, which is almost none ...
Um ok.
Do you even know how is FFXIV going to turn out when they do all this huge changes ?Are you 100% is gonna be good ?
Acording to you no1 would leave for a good , exciting and challenging mmo.I guess i must be unique .
Comparing FFXIV remake to a brand new mmo is the same.You see this games if you find them fun you play them , if not you dont.It is really that simple.
Last edited by Zkieve; 03-30-2011 at 08:01 AM.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote


