Quote Originally Posted by Angellos View Post
If 200 wasn't enough, and 400 isn't enough, 800 won't be enough:
Then clearly the system is flawed.
The problem is, your condition seems false to me.
What percentage of the player base has hit the current 400-item limit for the glamour dresser?
No one I know is even close.

I suspect that only a tiny fraction of the player base will even approach the 800-item limit of the glamour dresser. So to me it seems a complete waste of finite development resources to "re-work" the glamour system just to please that tiny fraction.
I'd far rather those resources went into developing new content.

Every system has limitations, but that doesn't make them necessarily flawed, and I don't see the current glamour system as flawed. I find it quite fun, even if I'd sometimes like to take a set of dressmaker shears to some of the stupid baggy and/or clunky things they hang off of many of the nicer tops, and even if I do miss most items taking two dyes (each with its own map of course) like items did in SWTOR.

And if you don't enjoy playing the current glamour system...
why do you need more than 800 items in your glamour chest?

These complaints, IMO, aren't motivated by the glamour system being flawed, they're motivated by the more-more-more gimme-gimme-gimme sense of entitlement that's all too common on these forums.