Glamour restrictions: a hinderance to creativity

[Darthgummibear]

What exactly is the point I am missing, cause you keep saying that. Yet have not expanded on it. Cannot be the point is I am making poor argument, cause I am not making one. Cannot be I am hindering others from having fun, cause I have no control over glam restrictions. Cannot be that I am starting trouble, cause I have not been hostile or have disregarded the opinion of anyone present.

I do get the point of the request you want as close as possible to unlimited options when it comes to available glamour options. You feel it limits hinders expressive creativity and generally pointless. Cool. I disagree, why is that an issue?

It was never about you simply disagreeing, and it's disingenuous of you to say that's the case. It was you saying more than once that they flat-out shouldn't do it regardless of the fact that it has no effect on you whatsoever. At best you're simply selfish.

[Bobby66]

It was never about you simply disagreeing, and it's disingenuous of you to say that's the case. It was you saying more than once that they flat-out shouldn't do it regardless of the fact that it has no effect on you whatsoever. At best you're simply selfish.

That is where the disagreement lays, you think SE should do it, I think they shouldn't. It does simply boil down to disagreeing how is that disingenuous. Aren't most requests made selfish in nature they are often made with personal pleasure in mind. Being selfish is not inherently wrong or evil. I would assume people are making this request as it would increase their own personal enjoyment of the game. Awesome!

Just because it has no effect on me does not mean I have to like it or be in favor of something. You can say I have a preference or bias towards one way of things being done, and thus I would prefer things to stay that way. If it does change so be it life goes on. I am not certain why exactly is that a problem with ya?