Glamour restrictions: a hinderance to creativity

[Bobby66]

Your hypocrisy knows no bounds.

How is that the case? I have not said you should feel the way I do about restrictions. Nor have I said you should like the current situation of glam. Idk just seems like you are annoyed that someone simply does not agree with your stance regarding glam.

As I said this largely boils down to me saying I like the way things are now, and I see no need for change. Yet you are saying no you cannot say that, you must agree with what we want because it has no impact on you personally. I mean sure it has no impact, it is still valid to like the ways things and not want change. I am in no way preventing this change from happening. I am dumb so might have to point out the hypocrisy, but for the most part I think this just boils down to a disagreement.

How you feel towards glam is valid, and maybe SE will listen and remove the restrictions. It is not like SE does surveys on this stuff and not my view on this topic is even popular. So not like you have to worry about my stance preventing this from happening. Though idk I do not see SE going back, maybe I could see them not having restrictions moving forward though.

[Darthgummibear]

How is that the case? I have not said you should feel the way I do about restrictions. Nor have I said you should like the current situation of glam. Idk just seems like you are annoyed that someone simply does not agree with your stance regarding glam.

As I said this largely boils down to me saying I like the way things are now, and I see no need for change. Yet you are saying no you cannot say that, you must agree with what we want because it has no impact on you personally. I mean sure it has no impact, it is still valid to like the ways things and not want change. I am in no way preventing this change from happening. I am dumb so might have to point out the hypocrisy, but for the most part I think this just boils down to a disagreement.

How you feel towards glam is valid, and maybe SE will listen and remove the restrictions. It is not like SE does surveys on this stuff and not my view on this topic is even popular. So not like you have to worry about my stance preventing this from happening. Though idk I do not see SE going back, maybe I could see them not having restrictions moving forward though.

Once again deliberately missing the point. Kudos.

[Bobby66]

Once again deliberately missing the point. Kudos.

What exactly is the point I am missing, cause you keep saying that. Yet have not expanded on it. Cannot be the point is I am making poor argument, cause I am not making one. Cannot be I am hindering others from having fun, cause I have no control over glam restrictions. Cannot be that I am starting trouble, cause I have not been hostile or have disregarded the opinion of anyone present.

I do get the point of the request you want as close as possible to unlimited options when it comes to available glamour options. You feel it limits hinders expressive creativity and generally pointless. Cool. I disagree, why is that an issue? It is okay to say nah I do not like that I rather things stay the same. That is a valid position. It is not a hill I will die on, if a poll or something came out I would vote no, but I would not seek for it to be removed if it was added. I would still prefer more racial specific gear that is made with the features unique to each race in mind. I would love for more gender specific gear be it male or female. Would neat to see something akin to GW cultural armor / weapons added to the game for various level ranges. If we get stuff like that cool, if not still cool game is still enjoyable for me. Just seems you are getting rather annoyed simply by the fact that some people disagree with the stance you hold.


People have differing views it does not mean they are out to ruin the fun of others. I enjoyed old cleric stance, I know many will disagree with me but they are not out to ruin my fun they have their own preferences. We can disagree on something and still be civil, we are all part of the same community.

[Darthgummibear]

What exactly is the point I am missing, cause you keep saying that. Yet have not expanded on it. Cannot be the point is I am making poor argument, cause I am not making one. Cannot be I am hindering others from having fun, cause I have no control over glam restrictions. Cannot be that I am starting trouble, cause I have not been hostile or have disregarded the opinion of anyone present.

I do get the point of the request you want as close as possible to unlimited options when it comes to available glamour options. You feel it limits hinders expressive creativity and generally pointless. Cool. I disagree, why is that an issue?

It was never about you simply disagreeing, and it's disingenuous of you to say that's the case. It was you saying more than once that they flat-out shouldn't do it regardless of the fact that it has no effect on you whatsoever. At best you're simply selfish.

[Bobby66]

It was never about you simply disagreeing, and it's disingenuous of you to say that's the case. It was you saying more than once that they flat-out shouldn't do it regardless of the fact that it has no effect on you whatsoever. At best you're simply selfish.

That is where the disagreement lays, you think SE should do it, I think they shouldn't. It does simply boil down to disagreeing how is that disingenuous. Aren't most requests made selfish in nature they are often made with personal pleasure in mind. Being selfish is not inherently wrong or evil. I would assume people are making this request as it would increase their own personal enjoyment of the game. Awesome!

Just because it has no effect on me does not mean I have to like it or be in favor of something. You can say I have a preference or bias towards one way of things being done, and thus I would prefer things to stay that way. If it does change so be it life goes on. I am not certain why exactly is that a problem with ya?