Yeah, that happens when you joke at the expense of those with concerns.
Being "more open" is just them showing/telling us what they're going to do, it doesn't mean any feedback will be acknowledged or acted upon. Naive, indeed.I realize that it's naive to say it, but I feel somewhat better about them stating that they're going to be more open with the reasoning on why they have made changes to classes. Mainly because we can call out bullshit and have an actual critical conversation with them. It's hard to have a conversation with someone about an action without knowing why the action was made. If that information is freely given then we can certainly do a better job at calling them out with dumb stuff like "Kaiten was removed due to action bloat" by pointing out the fact that so many other abilities could be merged if they mean "button bloat" and that removing Kaiten removed 1 button press every ~1 minute because you're just using the same kenki on 4 Shintens instead of 5 Kaitens.....
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.



Reply With Quote

