No one is asking you to make a martyr out of yourself and "endure" anything. If participating in discussions is detrimental to your mental wellbeing, then step away from the forums for a while. This is not the crusade you make it out to be, and disagreeing with you is not the personal attack you think it is.
There absolutely is a reason when I'm defining why you will be getting a response you perceive as a "backlash."
Sorry for trying to stop the game I liked from turning into what it's turning into. It's more than just "disagreeing" when it's clear that there is a group of people who do not want players like me around and are cheering this whole thing on. This isn't even as bad as some of these recent job changes because at least when it comes to that I can just change jobs. But when more and more of the story is going down this same path? What else am I supposed to turn to?
Авейонд-сны
Funnily enough, amongst my many gripes about her, Venat's being a revered genius never actually bothered me that much. As you say, given that someone who has previously occupied the seat of Azem likely contributed tremendously to her community, the fact that Convocation members tend towards the remarkable anyway, and that she has lived an unusually long life, I think that part of her characterisation was perfectly plausible.
What does bother me is how they never touch on that information after that point. Lahabrea in JP is referred to as "old man" when he hasn't yet retired; how much older then, is Venat, and why is she never presented as anything other than intelligent and experienced whilst retaining a relative sense of youth in comparison? Why does no one remark on how odd it is that she refuses to return to the star, and the potential reasons behind it? Or that her innate genius may have led to a form of arrogance resulting in such terrible decisions?
There is plenty there to make Venat a more fleshed out and ambiguous character, and yet they do nothing with it, which I take more issue with than her being "too" gifted.
What I've already been saying. Develop a stronger mentality to deal with disagreements and stop taking them personally, or go somewhere that will not cause you distress. If the game itself is bothering you - which I understand to some degree, it's not easy to see something you love change, especially when it feels for the worse - then you can either continue to play and hope for the best, or find a new game. Making yourself out to be a victim isn't the answer, though, and you may actually find some comfort in the realisation you are just one opinion amongst many.
You were rather adamant about the SMN changes staying as well despite the outcry, as I seem to recall.there is a group of people who do not want players like me around and are cheering this whole thing on.
I was under the impression that what made her different from the others is that like our Azem, she actually wandered around the world and experienced things. Most of the Convocation rarely if ever left Amaurot. Unless we were specifically chosen to replace Venat as Azem due to being equally batty, I think actually going to the world and meeting people and doing things down there affected the outlooks for both Azems.
I'm hoping for a Tales from the Dawn that will go into this and I'm at least expecting something from Venat's point of view, considering how important she is to the story and already had Hades and Elidibus' POVs in the Tales. Though I'm sure this thread or another will explode no matter what's written in it anyway.
When did we get Elidibus' POV in the tales? Afaik he hasnt gotten anything of the sort. We're just told he exited Zodiark to help mediate, we arent actually shown his pov in any of this.
Also can i ask for a source on the convocation "rarely if ever leaving amaurot?" Because i dont recall that ever being mentioned and Lahabrea kind of contradicts that seeing as Pandaemonium exists. Seems like headcanon to me.
Hythlodaeus points out during Elpis that Emet-Selch travelled Etheirys as well, helping others without ever expecting gratitude or praise in return. So Venat certainly wasn't unique in terms of actually walking amongst her people - though she certainly seemed to delude herself into thinking as such. It was never explicitly stated whether the other members of the Convocation travelled as well and to the same extent but I daresay it's a safe bet that they did to a decent degree.
As for a Venat centric story, I do suspect it wouldn't go down well if it was another 'here's why genocide is good, actually' moment. I will say, though, it's been positively delightful to watch the mental gymnastics from many of Venat's more...enthusiastic supporters declare that she had no choice despite, in some cases, spending years insisting that there was never a good excuse for genocide no matter how sympathetic the motive or backstory.
Hyth says in Elpis that Emet was essentially at Azem's beck and call. It's also implied that the two of them were who Azem turned to for assistance rather than the Convocation.
This. My best case scenario is it's a story about Venat and the person the Watcher was based on, even I'd be interested in reading about their relationship. However, no more glorification of Hydaelyn or celebration of the sundering, please.
Ah, the scene from "Ere Our Curtain Falls" was another Emet-Selch one about Elidibus. I misremembered that as being from his point of view.
Hytholodeus said that the others sat in Amaurot while the seat of Azem's role was to wander the world as the traveler and help people. Even if the others visited, that wasn't their main purpose and didn't do it to the same extent. The people Emet-Selch helped were from when he was Hades and before he was on the Convocation and we have no further insight into it except that it was "people the world over" but mostly Azem.
Originally Posted by Hythlodeus
Originally Posted by Emet-Selch
Originally Posted by Venat
Originally Posted by Ancient
I mean, they do tiptoe near that idea... (kidding... sort of.)
So you're saying that made her want to continue living? Interesting theory, and one it never occurred to me they might have been trying to hint at, despite it fitting in quite well with their "connections with people make life worth living" mantra. Though on the other hand it comes with insinuations about the other Ancients I'm a tad wary about, and it makes her decision to sunder a world she supposedly found so much joy and adventure in all the more tenuous... we will definitely get something from Venat's POV, though, every major character in an EP gets one, and it's usually fairly substantial in terms of insight into the character. I'll be very interested to see which direction they take it in - will they seek to appease those who criticise her actions by revealing some unflattering truths or self-introspection regarding the sundering, or make her all the more sympathetic and "stuck between a rock and a hard place", as it were?snip
And neither will those who think Endwalker was refreshingly uplifting, adore Venat, and enjoy the levity and humor the Scion cutscenes and Hildibrand questlines provide. It works both ways.
Last edited by Lunaxia; 07-03-2022 at 12:47 PM.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|