What's the point with that quite lackluster story in Endwalker?

[CrownySuccubus]

No, it's not "the exact same problem" when one group is the obvious minority. Do you realize this is the kind of reasoning people use to discredit safe spaces?

The reason the "safe space" analogy doesn't work here is because no one is being excluded from participating in a universal activity. For example, no one is kicking you off of FFXIV servers if you don't like the story the same way you can, say, be arrested for being trans in the wrong places.

What you're arguing is like an atheist walking into a church to argue whether God exists, being told to leave because they're disrupting the worshippers, claiming that this was unfair and wrong because it doesn't allow free speech, and then creating a new Church of Atheism that kicks out the first person argues that God exists.

Like I said, if that's what you want to do, then fine. It simply makes you NO BETTER than the people you're criticizing.

Yes. Because she is a person with a large platform and made a dismissive statement founded on nothing more than the thread title and its number of pages. Is there anything wrong with calling this out? Should we just take this lying down?

I mean, do what you want. But, I'm not exactly sure how you think arguing this with people who already agree with you "calls out" anything or isn't "taking it lying down".

But in any case, very well done. At the exact same moment wider attention was called to this thread, you have personally managed to derail it and make it entirely about how the minority is really, really mean to the majority. Not a great look for us, indeed. Mission accomplished, huh?

Pretty sure I've said that the majority is mean as well, and that I said MOST instances of discussion in this thread are chill.

I mean, if nothing else, you're proving my point that people are getting over-sensitive when someone dares disagree with the consensus even SLIGHTLY.

Feel free to type up a response to this, I will be ignoring it. No need to drag this out any longer, I wouldn't want you to derail the thread again with a back and forth like you did with Theodric when he rightly called out the obnoxious puritanical villain-fans-are-bad part of the fandom.

Thanks once again for proving my point that thread-posters tend to dislike back-and-forth arguments which ignore rest of the thread.

It's absolutely funny that you guys are agreeing with, and confirming, everything I said but want to act like I'm somehow the ignoble party here.

I see people talking about getting downvoted off of threads or getting kicked from discord groups. The closest thing to that here is if someone reports your post and it actually gets removed. I fail to see the issue with several people responding to you at once on this platform. Either way I think, we've belabored the point to death.

Teraq literally just explained in the quote above how merely ARGUING with opposition (especially when it's you alone versus a mob) is annoying, tiring and draining. Hell, both you and he have basically just decided to "ignore me" and disengage because you think I'm wrong and disrupting the the thread. Despite the fact, I might add, that your proposed "solution" was to pick one or two people to exclusively argue with on a thread or whatever.

So let me ask: do you guys like it when people you consider annoying continue to argue with you? Because it seems you think that's what I'm doing.