Personal houses should've been limited to 1 per service account long ago anyways, but that's a completely different issue that they should've already resolved.
They have been limited so. I'm not alluding to the few that were grandfathered in. People are getting around it right now, as always, with multiple accounts and FC ownership. And probably no small number of them will make their way to the RMT markets.
Ironically, if SE hadn't blocked private owners from the vast majority of land, it would be harder for the RMTers - since they'd at least have competition. Instead, ward takeovers are trivially easy for the people with multiple accounts and front FCs - because that's beyond what even most very dedicated players can do.
What call out and why are you so feisty?
Relax...
There were 2 880 plots per server (66) before 4.2. Let's say a very generous 10% of the houses were owned by players that already had a personal house. So 288 houses per server or 19,008 in total. Patch 6.1 increased the number of plots to 7,200. With the added servers (7), that makes a total of 525,600 plots.
Would you agree that during the 4 years and 3 months between those two patches:
- Half of the original amount of grandfathered personal houses was sold off prior to the invisible timer? (Whether they were acquired exclusively for resale purposes or not)
- Half of the remaining grandfathered personal houses that have not been sold off have since been reclaimed by the auto-demolition system or have been manually demolished ex: server transfer
Regardless of if you agree with the two questions above, you're looking at a grandfathering rate of:
-3.6%/19,008 houses if you are delusional
-1.8%/9,504 houses if you would agree that half of the grandfathered personal houses are gone
-0.9%/4,752 houses if you would agree that three quarters of the grandfathered personal houses are gone
To put things into perspective. A conservative estimate of the plots being vacated after the reinstatement of the auto-demolition system in 2020 vacated more than 18,000 plots.
https://datastudio.google.com/u/0/re...9aa/page/nYNyB
While new ward takeovers have been made easier by the lottery, you can't say it's currently beyond dedicated players. It's not true.
Dedicated players absolutely do have a chance at new ward takeovers that they didn't under FCFS. Even a brand new primal starting today has time to aim for a whole ward on the new EU servers in 2023. Materia DC provides a perfect opportunity for a dedicated beginner willing to put in that time to fund an EU takeover.
New challenge for the primals... aim for an entire 24 wards of Goblet.
Placard PvP. 48 go in, last person standing gets the plot?
Last edited by Shibi; 04-30-2022 at 11:58 AM.
やはり、お前は……笑顔が……イイ
While Square may have some clout what they don't have is volume guarantees. The vast majority of silicon has been going to the automotive industry and even they cannot get enough.
dont take anything from this kid seriously just a reminder in another post he said "different people pay different sub payments so the housing privilege's is somehow tied to how much or what length duration sub you pay with currency exchange rates" Basically he makes up stuff and pretends it matters.What call out and why are you so feisty?
Relax...
There were 2 880 plots per server (66) before 4.2. Let's say a very generous 10% of the houses were owned by players that already had a personal house. So 288 houses per server or 19,008 in total. Patch 6.1 increased the number of plots to 7,200. With the added servers (7), that makes a total of 525,600 plots.
Would you agree that during the 4 years and 3 months between those two patches:
- Half of the original amount of grandfathered personal houses was sold off prior to the invisible timer? (Whether they were acquired exclusively for resale purposes or not)
- Half of the remaining grandfathered personal houses that have not been sold off have since been reclaimed by the auto-demolition system or have been manually demolished ex: server transfer
Regardless of if you agree with the two questions above, you're looking at a grandfathering rate of:
-3.6%/19,008 houses if you are delusional
-1.8%/9,504 houses if you would agree that half of the grandfathered personal houses are gone
-0.9%/4,752 houses if you would agree that three quarters of the grandfathered personal houses are gone
To put things into perspective. A conservative estimate of the plots being vacated after the reinstatement of the auto-demolition system in 2020 vacated more than 18,000 plots.
https://datastudio.google.com/u/0/re...9aa/page/nYNyB
Before you type something make sure you have proof of what you're saying
Yeah I've seen him spew psuedo-intellectual tripe on other threads, that's why I'm not bothering dignifying him with a response. Just not worth the expended effort to interact with pretentious, self-serving wannabe housing moguls.dont take anything from this kid seriously just a reminder in another post he said "different people pay different sub payments so the housing privilege's is somehow tied to how much or what length duration sub you pay with currency exchange rates" Basically he makes up stuff and pretends it matters.
yeah LMFAO this dude says stuff like "oh we all dont pay different subs" Pulls out a chart showing price difference between 3 month sub and 1 month sub telling me somehow that has anything to with how majority of the people cant access housing... LOL apparently the price has something to do with it even though it clearly doesnt . just basically lying
Before you type something make sure you have proof of what you're saying
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.